Showing posts with label Philippines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philippines. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Philippines: North Luzon Expressway Rehabilitation and Expansion


ADB. On 26 October 2000, the Board of Directors of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) approved a direct loan of $45 million without a government guarantee and a complementary loan of $25 million to the Manila North Tollways Corporation (MNTC). Both loans were from ADB‘s ordinary capital resources and were used to finance the rehabilitation, expansion, and operation of 83.7 kilometers of the North Luzon Expressway (NLEX) between Manila and the Clark Special Economic Zone. The project involved rehabilitating 14 interchanges, 24 bridges, 31 overpasses, and the 8.8 kilometer expressway in the Subic Special Economic Zone.

The total project cost was $384.5 million, slightly above the budget estimate of $377.5 million. Design-change orders, additional land acquisition, and cost adjustments due to delayed right-of-way acquisition contributed to the increase. The project was financed with loans totaling $267.3 million plus equity of $117.2 million from MNTC‘s shareholders. Rehabilitation was completed in February 2005 and commercial operations started on 10 February 2005. The project was structured as a public–private partnership (PPP), and undertaken on a rehabilitate–operate–transfer basis by MNTC. At the end of the concession period in 2037, the expressway will be transferred to the government without cost.

The overall assessment of the project is successful, based upon a qualitative combination of the ratings of criteria set forth in ADB‘s Guidelines for Preparing Performance Evaluation Reports on Nonsovereign Operations. Four main criteria were used: development impact and outcomes, ADB investment profitability, ADB work quality, and ADB additionality. Development impact and outcomes were rated satisfactory according to four subcriteria: private sector development (rated satisfactory); business success (rated satisfactory); economic sustainability (rated satisfactory); and environmental, social, health, and safety performance (rated satisfactory).

The rehabilitated NLEX has contributed to the development of central and northern Luzon. There is evidence of new shopping malls, tourist sites, and entertainment complexes developing near toll junctions, especially in and near the Clark Special Economic Zone and the cities of San Fernando and Angeles. New residential subdivisions have sprung up in Bulacan and Pampanga, and tourism has benefited from faster access to Subic Bay, Baguio, and venues further north. Reduced journey times, too, have facilitated provision of fresher fruit, vegetables, and meat to Metro Manila, thereby reducing waste.

Performance Evaluation Report. Independent Evaluation Department.Reference Number: PPE: PHI 2011-35.Project Number: 33924.Investment/Loan Number: 7162/1769.November 2011


For more information about Projects in Philippines see SOUTHEASTERN ASIA Projects




x

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Green the new color of rice as the worlds most important food crop gets sustainability targets

UNEP.Nairobi/Manila, 1 December 2011.  At the inaugural meeting of the Sustainable Rice Platform held at IRRI's Headquarters in the Philippines this week, government representatives from Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam and Myanmar, many international and Asia-based companies and non-government organizations participated, demonstrating their support and interest in contributing to the initiative.

"There are many different sustainable technologies and practices for rice, the world's most important food crop that feeds half the planet," said James Lomax, from UNEP, which initiated the Sustainable Rice Platform.

"The challenge is to find a mechanism for scaling up these practices and their delivery in many countries," said Mr. Lomax. "The Sustainable Rice Platform provides opportunities for promoting resource use efficiency and sustainable trade flows throughout the value chain of the global rice sector and deliver real results to the lives of rice farmers."

The Sustainable Rice Platform will draw relevant lessons from established commodity initiatives that promote sustainability, such as for sugarcane, cotton, and coffee, and apply them to rice. It will set sustainability targets, develop and promote regional and global standards of best practices for rice production, and support rice farmers to adopt these practices. It will also identify criteria to assess how well the sustainability targets are being met and if farmers are implementing the practices.

"For example, we will harness our know-how to set standards to better manage insect pests in rice to reduce the unsafe and ineffective use of pesticides, which can damage the environment and the health of farmers," said Bas Bouman, who will lead the work at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) ; one of the project partners.

"We can also develop and promote the use of specialized field calculators to determine the environmental footprint of water, carbon, greenhouse gas emissions, or chemical use," he added.

Rice presents a unique challenge for any quality control system because it is mostly grown by hundreds of thousands of poor farmers who have only very small farms of less than one hectare each. Moreover, 90 percent of rice is grown in developing countries in Asia where access to knowledge and support is limited.

National government agricultural departments will explore and test management practices to make them nationally relevant and to promote them to rice farmers. Non-government organizations and companies will assist to develop the sustainability criteria to help safeguard or improve environmental health.

Rice farmers, production, processing, or trade organizations and businesses, will use the Sustainable Rice Platform to secure a sustainable rice system and crucially explore incentive mechanisms for farmers to grow rice more sustainably.

"Rice is an extremely important food crop, both for Kellogg Company and the world. We are therefore delighted to support UNEP in the mass adoption of better and more sustainable rice-growing practices to improve the world's food supply and the lives of the farmers and the communities who produce it," Chief Sustainability Officer at Kellogg Company, Diane B. Holdorf.

"In addition to financial support," she added. "We intend to fast track sustainable techniques into our contract growing programs as soon as 2012. We'll share the results with the Sustainable Rice Platform and use them to inform our global rice policies and direction."

Fast facts

The Sustainable Rice Platform will set management standards for rice production that will ensure it is grown in an environmentally-sustainable and socially-responsible way;

Poverty will reduce as farmers stand to gain by higher incomes through reduced input costs, higher production, and/or getting a premium on their rice;

Consumers and processors purchasing rice grown on the Sustainable Rice Platform will be assured it is good for the environment and farmer welfare.

Contacts
Moira O'Brien-Malone, Head, DTIE Communications, UNEP Paris, tel: + 33 1 44 37 76 12, mob: +33 6 82 26 93 73, moira.obrien-malone@unep.org

s

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

East Asia and Pacific Economic Update.Navigating Turbulence,Sustaining Growth

World Bank.November 2011. Growth in developing East Asia in the first half of 2011 remained strong, but continued to moderate, mainly due to weakening external demand. Global growth was also affected by supply shocks from geopolitical disturbances in the Middle East, supply chain disruptions following the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, and a slower-than-expected recovery of private demand in crisis-affected countries. More recently, uncertainties over fiscal sustainability in the U.S. and sovereign debt in the Eurozone fed financial volatility and affected investor and consumer sentiment.
Domestic demand in East Asian economies has also been softening, driven by the normalization of fiscal and monetary policy, although it remained robust and the largest contributor to growth. We project that real GDP in developing East Asia will increase by 8.2 percent in 2011 (4.7 percent excluding China), while growth will slow to 7.8 percent in 2012. Risks are on the downside, however. Based on the still robust current growth projections, the proportion of people living on less than US$2 a day indeveloping East Asia is expected to decrease to about 24 percent in 2011, down two percentage points from 2010, and an estimated 38 million people are projected to move out of poverty. However, poverty reduction efforts would be hampered in the event of another sudden increase in food prices against a backdrop of slowing income growth.

The growth slowdown was particularly pronounced in industrial production. Exports of major regional industrial supply chains, especially electronics, have started to decline. Demand for commodities and raw materials remained strong, helping resource-rich economies maintain high levels of export and GDP growth. East Asia, and China in particular, is gaining importance as a source of global demand, while rising consumer goods imports in China are benefiting the region’s manufacturing exporters.
In the short- to medium-term, East Asia’s growth prospects are constrained by global uncertainty and by the impact of natural disasters. The slow progress towards resolution of debt problems in the Eurozone intensified investors’ concerns over global growth and stability. As capital flowed out of emerging markets into relatively safer havens, portfolio investments reversed and stock markets lost value in East Asia. Markets remain jittery, even after the Eurozone countries agreed on a solution for the sovereign debt and banking problems. Fiscal and financial consolidation in the Eurozone is likely to reduce growth in Europe, and could lead to renewed financial outflows from East Asia as banks shore up their capital coverage. Credit outstanding from European banks to developing East Asia amounts to US$427 billion, or six percent of GDP. But high reserves and current account surpluses protect most East Asian countries against the impact of possible renewed financial stress.
The effects of flooding in several countries are likely to take a toll on growth this year. Because of widespread flooding, Thailand’s GDP growth for 2011 was revised down to 2.4 percent, although the final tally of the damage done is yet to be made. Losses in production are being felt in the entire region, as the impact of the disaster is spreading through the industrial supply chains. While reconstruction after the flood in 2012 is likely to contribute to growth, the resilience of East Asia’s production networks is being tested once more. Earlier in the year, after the March 11 earthquake and tsunami in Japan, East Asian countries suffered production losses from disrupted supply chains in electronics and automotive industries. However, these returned to their pre-disaster growth rates and production levels shortly after Japanese industry recovered in June. This time, recovery of production to pre-disaster levels in the region will also depend on the strength of global demand for electronics and cars.
With growing recognition that the current global economic slowdown could continue into the long-term, policymakers in East Asia are rethinking their policy options. With a few exceptions, notably Vietnam and Mongolia, the emphasis navigating turbulence, sustaining growth has shifted from fighting inflation and dealing with excess capital inflows to sustaining growth, now the dominant concern.
In the short-term, striking a balance between stimulating growth and fighting the effects of global uncertainty is the primary challenge. Policymakers are likely to hold off further policy tightening and stand ready to act should furthernegative shocks to growth occur or in the extreme case of a disorderly resolution of the Eurozone debt problem.
Monetary policy normalization has already been on hold in most countries in recent months and some central banks have started to cut official interest rates. In countries where the recent financial turbulence resulted in significant pressures on exchange rates, policymakers have also intervened in the currency markets. In this scenario it will also be important to take precautionary steps against financial risks arising from sudden downward movements in asset prices. Fiscal positions, while not as strong as before the 2008 crisis, leave sufficient space for fiscal stimulus in most middle-income countries should this become necessary.
Stimulus alone will not be enough to address the likely prolonged weakness in the global economy. Slow global growth presents an opportunity for East Asian governments to refocus on reforms that will enhance growth in the mediumand long-term. Increasing productivity and moving toward higher value-added production can be achieved through higher investment, including in productive infrastructure, education, and in building social security systems in most countries. Where levels of investments are already high, increasing the quality and efficiency of these investments should be the first priority alongside rebalancing growth towards domestic consumption. Improvements in public investment programs and regulatory frameworks will improve the quality of investments and increase investment rates. Further investment in disaster management and prevention is also becoming increasingly important for the region. Any fiscal stimulus should promote these structural reforms that support rebalancing and domestic sources of growth.
Once volatility in global financial markets recedes, capital flows are likely to return to East Asia. When that happens, a concerted effort in the region to use exchange rate flexibility to gain more independence in monetary policy, as well as to shift demand towards domestic sources, could become an option yet again. Efforts to deepen regional integration through existing regional initiatives can boost regional trade and demand and help establish the East Asia and Pacific region’s new role in leading the global economy.
KEY FINDINGS 
Real GDP in developing East Asia is projected to increase by 8.2 percent in 2011 (4.7 percent excluding China), while growth will slow to 7.8 percent in 2012.
In 2011, an estimated 38 million people will move out of poverty, and the proportion of people living on less than US$2 a day is expected to decrease to about 24 percent, down two percentage points from 2010.

Growth in developing East Asia in the second half of 2011 continued to moderate, mainly due to weakening external demand. Domestic demand in East Asian economies remained the largest contributor to growth, although it is easing driven by the normalization of fiscal and monetary policy.

The growth slowdown in East Asia was particularly pronounced in industrial production. Exports of major regional industrial supply chains, especially electronics, have started to decline.

Demand for commodities and raw materials remained strong, helping resource-rich economies maintain high levels of export and GDP growth.
China is gaining importance as a source of global demand as imports held up better than exports. A shift to more consumer goods imports in China is benefiting the region’s manufacturing exporters.
Lower growth in Europe in the course of fiscal austerity and the banks’ needs to increase capital coverage would affect East Asia. Less credit from European banks can also affect capital flows to East Asia.
High reserves and current account surpluses protect most countries in the region against the impact of possible renewed financial stress.
Due to widespread flooding, Thailand’s GDP growth was revised downwards to 2.4 percent, although damage assessments are not complete. Reconstruction after the flood is likely to contribute to growth in 2012.
Impacts of the disaster are spreading through industrial supply chains. Recovery of production to pre-disaster levels in the region will also depend on the strength of global demand for electronics and cars.
In the short-term, striking a balance between stimulating growth and fighting the effects of global uncertainty is the primary challenge for policy makers.

Fiscal positions in most countries, while not as strong as before the 2008 crisis, leave sufficient space for fiscal stimulus if necessary

Slow global growth presents an opportunity for governments to refocus on reforms that will enhance growth in the medium- and long-term.

Higher investment, including in productive infrastructure, education, and in building social security systems, can help countries increase productivity and move toward higher value-added production.

Where levels of investments are already high, increasing the quality and efficiency of these investments should be the first priority alongside rebalancing growth towards domestic consumption.
Given the outlook for protracted low global growth, any possible stimulus should be fiscally sustainable, well-targeted, and directed at promoting the structural transformation needed to sustain stronger, domestically driven growth.
Further investment in disaster management and prevention is also becoming more important for the region.
Full report
Summary
Chapter 1: Weak External Demand Slows Growth 
Chapter 2: Policies Refocus on Sustaining Growth
Chapter 3: New Risks Add to Old Challenges
Country sections
Appendixes

  • All Countries (2.71mb pdf)
  • Cambodia (262kb pdf)
  • China (263kb pdf)
  • Fiji (260kb pdf)
  • Indonesia (267kb pdf)
  • Lao PDR (260kb pdf)
  • Malaysia (263kb pdf)
  • Mongolia (259kb pdf)
  • Papua New Guinea (262kb pdf)
  • Philippines (262kb pdf)
  • Small Pacific Islands (61kb pdf)
  • Solomon Islands (265kb pdf)
  • Thailand (264kb pdf)
  • Timor-Leste (247kb pdf)
  • Vietnam (261kb pdf)

  • a

    Thursday, November 24, 2011

    Philippines.Solid macroeconomic fundamentals cushion external turmoil

    The Philippines quarterly update provides an update on key economic developments and policies over the past three months. It also presents findings from recent World Bank work on the Philippines. It places them in a longer-term and global context, and assesses the implications of these developments and other changes in policy for the outlook for the Philippines.

    Its coverage ranges from the macro-economy to financial markets to indicators of human welfare and development. It is intended for a wide audience, including policy makers, business leaders, financial market participants, and the community of analysts and professionals engaged in the Philippines. After a strong rebound in 2010, economic growth in 2011 is likely to remain around 5 percent with downside risks. In response to the slower growth and the weaker economic outlook in advanced economies, we revise our growth forecast downward from 5.0 percent to 4.5 percent for 2011 and from 5.4 percent to 5.0 percent for 2012.
    The Philippines is enjoying relative political stability and its fiscal position has improved. Capital inflows are expected to continue, but Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is projected to moderate as foreign investors have become more cautious in light of the recent financial turmoil. Consumption is expected to be buoyed by falling unemployment, the government's expansion of the conditional cash transfer program, and sustained remittance inflows. The current account surplus is projected to rise driven by

    World Bank.Author:Yi,Soonhwa;Lachler,Ulrich;Rosario,Diana del.Document Date:2011/09/01.Document Type:Working Paper.Report Number:65750.Volume No: 1 of 1

    Quarterly economic update: solid macroeconomic fundamentals cushion external turmoil  a

    Wednesday, November 23, 2011

    Philippines. Public expenditure review:strengthening public finance for more inclusive growth

    This Public Expenditure Review (PER) aims to provide information, analysis and guidance to support the Philippines in this important endeavor. Its primary target audience is the incoming government and, especially, its economic and social policy teams.

    The report aims to be overarching, but not comprehensive, focusing on the impact of government revenues and expenditures on development outcomes.

    A key finding of this PER is that shortfalls in the size of public spending generally appear to be more important than shortfalls in the quality or efficiency of public spending in explaining these performance gaps. The health sector exhibits a similarly close relationship between public expenditures and sector outcomes. Sustainable reform of tax policies and tax administration will require a firm commitment at the highest political level and sound strategic management at the bureaucratic level.