Showing posts with label innovation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label innovation. Show all posts

Monday, January 2, 2012

Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A Model Based on Entrepreneur Development


This article proposes a person centered model for entrepreneurship, rather than one based on an idea or business plan. It analyzes the characteristics of entrepreneurship!development programs worldwide and presents a representative sample of best practices. On the basis of the main findings and lessons learned,we define the characteristics and components of a new mod el for entrepreneur development and present recommendations as to how to deploy the model in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC).

Lorenzo Vicens and Sergio Grulló.Inter-American Development Bank Capital Markets and  Financial Institutions Division DISCUSSION PAPER No. IDB-DP-202.November 2011

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Council of The European Union.Launching of five joint programming initiatives for research

Council of The European Union.Brussels.6 December 2011. EMPHASISES that Joint Programming in research in the areas of the five proposed initiatives:'Healthy and Productive sea and Oceans','Urban Europe - Global Urban Challenges, Joint European Solutions','Connecting Climate Knowledge for Europe','Water Challenges for a Changing World','The Microbial Challenge - An Emerging Threat to Human Health'.

will contribute to the reduction of fragmentation of research efforts of Member States and will step up the mobilisation of skills, knowledge and resources, with a view to advancing and strengthening Europe's leadership and competitiveness of research and innovation in these fields. INVITES the Member States, participating in the framework of the five initiatives respectively, to:

i.Develop a common vision, based on a multidisciplinary approach, on how cooperation and coordination in the field of research at the European level can improve addressing the challenges presented in the initiatives in order to ensure the efficiency of the joint efforts of Member States. ii. Develop a Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) establishing medium to long term research needs and objectives in the areas of the five initiatives. The Strategic Research Agendas should be further developed towards an implementation plan establishing priorities and timelines and specifying the actions, instruments and resources required for its implementation. The contents, work programmes and implementation plans should take into account the scientific, technological, societal and innovation impacts of the supported research.

iii. Jointly implement the Strategic Research Agenda, including via their national research programmes taking into account the Voluntary Guidelines on Framework Conditions for Joint Programming in Research developed by the High Level Group on Joint Programming (GPC) or other national research activities.

iv. Set up and maintain an efficient common management structure in the field of the five initiatives respectively, with a mandate to establish appropriate conditions, rules and procedures for cooperation and coordination and to monitor the implementation of the Strategic Research Agenda. Such management structure should be lean, efficient and flexible and should take account of the Voluntary Guidelines on Framework Conditions for Joint Programming in Research developed by the GPC.

v. Build on the existing expertise within the Commission and take into account the voluntary guidelines on framework conditions when developing and implementing the Strategic Research Agenda with a view to coordinating the joint programming initiatives and ensuring overall coherence with other relevant programmes and initiatives, while avoiding unnecessary duplication with existing and future Union initiatives in these areas.

3133rd COMPETITIVENESS (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) Council meeting

Launching of five joint programming initiatives for research,

Council of The European Union.Conclusions on partnering in research and innovation

Council of The European Union.Brussels.6 December 2011. UNDERLINES the need to a) deliver added value at the European and Member States level through the partnering approach; b) improve conditions allowing and encouraging all interested Member States and other stakeholders to participate in different forms of partnering, while maintaining their voluntary nature and taking account of national approaches to research funding; c) increase and maintain the commitment and active participation of all partners including the private sector, especially small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), in publicprivate partnerships; d) develop synergies and complementarities between Horizon 2020 and the Common Strategic Framework for Cohesion Policy when developing partnering activities, while recognising that these instruments have different purposes; e) reduce the administrative burden for all participants in partnering instruments and pursue the effort of simplification of rules and procedures.

EMPHASISES the need to create a transparent and accessible overall landscape of programmes and instruments for all parties involved. To this end, NOTES the need for rationalisation, including mergers when deemed appropriate, to avoid unnecessary duplication and overlapping, and LOOKS FORWARD to discussing this issue further in the context of, amongst others, the Commission proposals for Horizon 2020 and the ERA Framework.

As regards the Public-Public Partnerships (P2Ps)
EMPHASISES the need to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of existing partnering instruments and TAKES NOTE of the Commission's intention to merge existing instruments, such as ERA-NETs and ERA-NET Plus, to form a single, more flexible and ERA-NET-like instrument and LOOKS FORWARD to discussing this aspect in the context of Horizon 2020.

EMPHASISES the nature of Joint Programming as a Member States led voluntary process and its significant potential for R&I in Europe and contribution to address major societal challenges; CALLS for considering synergies between JPIs and Framework Programme instruments, in particular for the use of its P2P instruments, where the area being addressed by a JPI fits with Horizon 2020 priorities; ENCOURAGES the Member States participating in JPIs to make best use of the Voluntary Guidelines on Framework Conditions for Joint Programming and RECALLS the need to regularly review these guidelines based on the experience of the JPIs with the aim to improve their applicability.

ACKNOWLEDGES that, in order to ensure strong, long-term partnerships, questions related to issues such as IP management, funding and improvement of cross-border cooperation and knowledge circulation need to be addressed also in the context of the development of the ERA Framework and that this process must fully recognise the voluntary nature of individual partnerships and the need to respect national competence.

3133rd COMPETITIVENESS (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space)

Council meeting Council of The European Union.Conclusions on partnering in research and innovation,

Sunday, December 4, 2011

East Asia.Strengthening Evaluation of Poverty Reduction Innovations : Regional

The TA will improve DMC ability to measure, evaluate, and replicate access to finance and other related poverty reduction efforts by increasing understanding and application of randomized control trials and other modern evaluation techniques. The TA will achieve this result in three ways. First, it will introduce new evaluation techniques to DMC officials and academics in a short, practical training course, with information on how to apply the results to improve policy and practice.

Second, the TA will run a three day international conference, where practitioners and researchers from around the globe will present the latest evaluation results of projects in financial access and poverty reduction to policymakers. Gender impact will be an essential aspect of the presentations. Finally, an evaluation implementation grants program to be awarded at the end of the conference will facilitate evaluation benefits and capacity building for DMCs.  

Asian Development Bank.Project Number.45292-01

East Asia.Strengthening Evaluation of Poverty Reduction Innovations : Regional a

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Trinidad & Tobago.Innovation for Lasting Prosperity Medium-Term Policy Framework 2011-2014

This Medium-Term Policy Framework (MTPF) 2011–2014, embracing the theme ‘Innovation for Lasting Prosperity’ outlines Government’s perspective and intent on the socio-economic transformation that needs to take place in order to achieve our commitment to the people of Trinidad and Tobago of ‘Prosperity for All’. It is intended to be the first of the MTPFs to be articulated by this Government.

Within the context of the seven (7) development pillars articulated by the Government, the main thrusts of this MTPF are:
• To diversify and deepen the production base in order to ensure that in a context of depleting energy resources, the economy will continue to grow and sustain a high standard of living

• To move the economy up the value chain, improve competitiveness and expand investment both local and foreign
• To have a secure and safe nation and to strengthen the framework, institutions and infrastructure to support human security

• To expand the capacity of our citizens for knowledge accumulation and use, innovation, creativity and entrepreneurial activity

• To reduce socio-economic and regional inequalities within our borders, move people out of poverty and promote social inclusion through more meaningful economic participation

As the first overarching planning document of the new Administration, the opportunity has been taken in Part I to articulate in some detail the broad strategic direction being taken to restructure and transform the economy and the society; and the policy shifts that are necessarily being engineered to ensure that there is a decisive departure from past attempts at managing our development. This is in keeping with our understanding of the expectations of our citizens as well as in keeping with our commitment to them to lead and effect change.

This policy framework is a landmark achievement as it represents the first time any attempt has been made to integrate and articulate Government’s approach to development on the basis of shared priorities and cross cutting interventions. It represents a departure from the independent approach of State entities which results in the creation of silos. This framework encourages greater collaboration and the establishment of functional relationships among Ministries and agencies in an attempt to achieve greater coherence and effectiveness in implementing Government’s development objectives. Moreover, it provides clarity on Government’s objectives, which is beneficial for all stakeholders.

In setting five (5) priorities for action over the next three (3) years, the Government is effectively responding to some of the major concerns of the population while, at the same time, setting the foundations for achieving sustainable economic and social advancement of all citizens in the future. The priorities as elaborated in Part II of this MTPF are:

1. Crime and Law and Order;

2. Agriculture and Food Security;

3. Health Care Services and Hospitals;

4. Economic Growth, Job Creation, Competitiveness and Innovation; and

5. Poverty Reduction and Human Capital Development.

A final chapter outlines the role of the key stakeholders and the new institutional arrangements that have been put in place to guide and manage the development process. The Appendices identify the main projects in the 2011/2012 Public Sector Investment Programme (PSIP) that are aligned to the five (5) priorities for action over the planning horizon and the specific priorities of each Ministry.

Trinidad & Tobago.Innovation for Lasting Prosperity Medium-Term Policy Framework 2011-2014s

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Asia.Strengthening Evaluation of Poverty Reduction Innovations

Asian Development Bank.The TA will improve DMC ability to measure, evaluate, and replicate access to finance and other related poverty reduction efforts by increasing understanding and application of randomized control trials and other modern evaluation techniques. The TA will achieve this result in three ways. First, it will introduce new evaluation techniques to DMC officials and academics in a short, practical training course, with information on how to apply the results to improve policy and practice.

Second, the TA will run a three day international conference, where practitioners and researchers from around the globe will present the latest evaluation results of projects in financial access and poverty reduction to policymakers. Gender impact will be an essential aspect of the presentations. Finally, an evaluation implementation grants program to be awarded at the end of the conference will facilitate evaluation benefits and capacity building for DMCs.


s

Horizon 2020.The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation

Horizon 2020 is the financial instrument implementing the Innovation Union, a Europe 2020 flagship initiative aimed at securing Europe's global competitiveness. Running from 2014 to 2020 with an €80 billion budget, the EU’s new programme for research and innovation is part of the drive to create new growth and jobs in Europe.

Horizon 2020 provides major simplification through a single set of rules. It will combine all research and innovation funding currently provided through the Framework Programmes for Research and Technical Development, the innovation related activities of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) and the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT).

The adoption of Horizon 2020 will:

  • Strengthen the EU’s position in science with a dedicated budget of € 24 598 million. This will provide a boost to top-level research in Europe, including an increase in funding of 77% for the very successful European Research Council (ERC).
  • Strengthen industrial leadership in innovation € 17 938 million. This includes major investment in key technologies, greater access to capital and support for SMEs.
  • Provide € 31 748 million to help address major concerns shared by all Europeans such as climate change, developing sustainable transport and mobility, making renewable energy more affordable, ensuring food safety and security, or coping with the challenge of an ageing population.
Horizon 2020 will tackle societal challenges by helping to bridge the gap between research and the market by, for example, helping innovative enterprise to develop their technological breakthroughs into viable products with real commercial potential. This market-driven approach will include creating partnerships with the private sector and Member States to bring together the resources needed.

Horizon 2020 will be complemented by further measures to complete and further develop the European Research Area by 2014. These measures will aim at breaking down barriers to create a genuine single market for knowledge, research and innovation.

Follow here for a presentation on Horizon 2020

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Reauthorize the Small Business innovation and Research and Small Business Technology Transfer programs for another eight years

Recent Press Releases.Nov 29 2011. WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Mary L. Landrieu, D-La., Chair of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, made the following comments following the Senate's unanimous vote on Amendment 1115 to the National Defense Authorization bill. The amendment would reauthorize the Small Business innovation and Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs for another eight years.

“Tonight, we are closer than we’ve ever been on achieving a long-term reauthorization for the SBIR and STTR programs,” Senator Landrieu said. “My Senate colleagues and I have been working all year to get this done and, with this vote, the Senate has set politics aside and given our support to small business and innovation. This amendment not only keeps these programs alive, it also gives them stability and I thank Senators Levin and McCain for their help in getting tonight’s vote. I am hopeful our counterparts in the House will work with us to bring this to the President’s desk immediately so that we can continue to keep our nation on the forefront of defense technology and scientific innovation.”

The amendment, which passed by unanimous voice vote, provides for a long-term extension of SBIR and STTR programs through 2019.

Enacted by Congress in 1982, the SBIR program is the largest federal research and development program for small businesses and one of the largest examples of U.S. public-private partnerships. The program allows small businesses to compete for a portion of federal research dollars in order to help the agencies meet their many missions. By including small businesses in the nation’s R&D efforts, SBIR grants and contracts are intended to stimulate innovative solutions to help the agencies meet specific research and development needs, from areas of health and environment to national defense and agriculture, and move the ideas from lab to market, whether for the government or commercial purposes.j

Monday, November 28, 2011

Raising the competitiveness of El Salvador

UNCTAD/PRESS/PR/2011/052. Geneva, 23 November 2011. Increased investment in science, technology and innovation (STI) in El Salvador is required in order to help advance the country´s economic performance, concludes the Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (STIP) Review of El Salvador published today by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) in cooperation with the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).
Given that financial resources are scarce, the prioritization of investments in a few selected strategic sectors or technologies (based on a foresight study of key sectors and market potential) will be necessary.
The UNCTAD review underlines the need for greater public and private investment in knowledge-generation and its use in productive activities. Coherent public policies can promote stronger productive and innovation capacities and make full use of the country´s potential.
Establishing a coordinated national strategy for the development of STI in El Salvador will be essential to help local industry compete, generate employment opportunities, improve standards of living, and promote the country´s growth and export diversification strategy.
The study also emphasizes the importance of investing in the development of human capital: (a) by enhancing the quality of education at all levels, in particular the quality of scientific and technological education; and (b) by offering incentives, such as the establishment of research fellowships and accreditation systems, to promote research in institutions of higher education.
A number of measures are suggested in the review to promote private-sector development and innovation activities - such as increasing access to venture and seed capital, promoting collaboration and technology transfer between universities, research institutes and companies, and supporting the development of business incubators.
Stronger investment in STI would raise productivity and transform the country´s productive structure toward activities with higher value added. For example, the value of El Salvador´s diversified agricultural production could be increased with stronger agroindustrial capacities. The development of such capacities requires increased investment in education and research, the promotion of innovation activities in agroindustrial businesses, and the strengthening of collaboration among producers, industry, researchers and trainers.
The country can rely on a number of assets in the sphere of science, technology and innovation that can serve as the basis for progress and successful results. These include pockets of high-quality education and research capacity, and a large untapped potential of Salvadoreans abroad.
The report identifies a number of programmes already in place in El Salvador that have brought positive results. Examples include innovation funds that encourage investment in research and development activities. The Government of El Salvador could continue building upon such successful initiatives, which have, so far, been underfunded.
The Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (STIP) Review of El Salvador was prepared at the request of the Government of El Salvador. The report examines the country´s national innovation system from a general perspective and discusses the potential for innovation in two strategic sectors: agroindustry, and information and communications technologies.

This study is part of a wider UNCTAD programme to promote the development of policymaking capacities in the area of science, technology and innovation policies.

a

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Effects of Innovation on Employment in Latin America: the microeconomic evidence. Comparative results

The potential for inclusive growth in the region depends on its capacity to generate good quality employment.There are high expectations by regional Policy Makers on the potential of STI to trigger inclusive growth. However, we know very little on the transmission mechanisms and dynamics between innovation and job performance. Comparative research in four countries: Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica and Uruguay.

Results will help us to better understand a very complex phenomena (very little studied in the region) and to generate inputs for the design of public policies that maximize the employment generation impacts of innovation and at the same time mitigate its negative consequences.

Motivation

Our own work on the link between innovation and productivity research shows that the lack of innovation negatively affects productivity levels.  How this affects labor market outcomes?.

However, we still lack knowledge on the relation between employment and innovation. Evidence from more developed countries or regions might not be applicable. Need to provide evidence for policy-making.

In Latin America the production structure is strongly dominated by small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Indeed, SMEs’ innovation is strongly dominated by informal search routines and learning from already available knowledge and technologies.

Importance of assessing the effects on employment (level and composition). It is not only quantity what matters, but also quality.

Focus

This paper focuses on the (short term) link between innovation and employment. Based on national country studies performed by different research teams.

Coverage: Comparative research in four countries: Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica and Uruguay.

Novel features (as a project): Emphasis on SMEs, sectoral differences (low/high tech sectors). Extensions of the project during this session and following session. To further increase comparability and homogeneity among countries possibility to use Enterprise Surveys for LAC.

Gustavo Crespi and Ezequiel Tacsir. Science and Technology Division. IDB.

Friday, November 18, 2011

The imperative of innovation:creating prosperity in Latin America and the Caribbean

Today’s economies are increasingly becoming knowledge economies. The ability and speed with which societies can absorb new technologies, access and share global information, and create and disseminate new knowledge are the main determinants of their ability to function and compete.
Traces of these trends are everywhere: investment in knowledge-related activities has been growing faster than capital investment in advanced economies for at least a decade. The knowledge content of products and services is on the rise all over the world. The labor market shows a growing “skills bias” both in developed and developing economies, signaling that jobs growth will be in those occupations that involve sophisticated handling of symbols, information, and analysis. The most dynamic industries are those that can be classified as knowledge intensive, and all economic activities, even the most traditional, are increasingly influenced by technology and innovation.
Latin America and the Caribbean face the challenge of effectively embracing these transcendental changes. If the region is to create opportunities for the next generation to participate meaningfully in the global economy, science, technology, and innovation must be accorded the highest priority by leaders in both the public and the private sectors. The accelerated pace of innovation creates the need to build technological capacity in developing economies, if only to achieve the modest objective of becoming technologically literate in order to benefit from innovations originating elsewhere.
In 2010, the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) published The Imperative of Innovation, a survey of the status of science, technology, and innovation (STI) in the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region. The region’s technological progress was found to be uneven and insufficient, especially in relation to other regions of the world.
In some cases, the region lost ground over the past 10 years in global rankings compared to some of the rapidly developing economies of East Asia. In other cases, the LAC region made progress, but so, too, did other regions. The book itself was very well received among policy makers, reflecting a growing interest on the part of its main intended audience. In a short period of time, a considerable amount of new evidence was collected as a result of a series of policy research initiatives, several of them carried out by the Science and Technology Division at the IDB, leading to even greater understanding of how innovation works in the region. This was the genesis of the second edition.
The main purposes of the second edition are to present updated information and to introduce some of the new research and policy know-how accumulated in the course of IDB lending and technical assistance operations in STI. Most of the original diagnostic remains unchanged, mostly in the initial section, although figures have been updated reflecting the most recently available data. The new figures and indicators presented in this edition are derived from the Compendium of STI indicators compiled by the IDB in late 2010.
Some highlights of the second edition include:
Further evidence of the positive effect of innovation on productivity at the firm level, including the finding that productivity gaps between innovative and non-innovative firms are larger in Latin American countries than in European countries (see particularly the beginning of Section I and Box 3).
New data on the positive impact of technology development funds on innovation outcomes and on business performance in the medium to long term (see Box 3).
New evidence of the complex relationship between innovation and employment, suggesting that the absence of innovation is associated with negative employment outcomes (see the special title dedicated to the issue in the first Section).
A description of an innovative project where the Science and Technology Division used crowd sourcing and Web 2.0 tools to conduct a participatory exercise in the area of technology for social inclusion, an issue of growing interest to policy makers across the region (see Box 10).

New evidence on gender issues in science and technology (see Box 1).
Although information and communications technology (ICT) was covered in the first edition, the second edition contains more information on the extent to
which connectivity, broadband, and the telecommunications sector generally are rapidly becoming central issues for governments, firms, and citizens, along
with STI and general economic policy. The infrastructure necessary to support ICT is a challenge to the region that should be addressed through new policies and publicprivate partnerships.
This volume reflects the IDB’s commitment to remain a key partner in the development of STI policy in Latin America and the Caribbean. It is offered as a contribution to the policy debate on the critical issues involved.
Flora Montealegre Painter
Chief, Science and Technology Division
Inter-American Development Bank
Prepared by a team in the Science and Technology Division of the IDB; supervised by Flora Montealegre Painter;written by Juan Carlos Navarro and Pluvia Zúñiga]. 2nd ed. p. cm. – (Monographs ; 111) Includes bibliographical references (p. 63-66). 2011

Thursday, November 17, 2011

The World Intellectual Property Report 2011-The Changing Face of Innovation

WIO. Geneva, November 14, 2011 PR/2011/700     The World Intellectual Property Report 2011- The Changing Face of Innovation – a new WIPO publication – describes how ownership of intellectual property (IP) rights has become central to the strategies of innovating firms worldwide. With global demand for patents rising from 800,000 applications in the early 1980s to 1.8 million in 2009, the Report concludes that growing investments in innovation and the globalization of economic activities are key drivers of this trend.
As a result, IP policy has moved to the forefront of innovation policy. In a foreword to the Report, WIPO Director General Francis Gurry notes that “innovation growth is no longer the prerogative of high-income countries alone; the technological gap between richer and poorer countries is narrowing. Incremental and more local forms of innovation contribute to economic and social development, on a par with world-class technological innovations.”
The Report points to a number of implications of the growing demand for IP rights, namely:
  • Knowledge markets based on IP rights are on the rise. Evidence suggests that firms trade and license IP rights more frequently. Internationally, royalty and licensing fee revenue increased from USD 2.8 billion in 1970 to USD 27 billion in 1990, and to approximately USD 180 billion in 2009 – outpacing growth in global GDP. New market intermediaries have emerged, such as IP clearinghouses and brokerages.
Evidence shows that knowledge markets enable firms to specialize, allowing them to be more innovative and efficient at the same time. In addition, they allow firms to control which knowledge to guard and which to share so as to maximize learning – a key element of modern open innovation strategies.
  • Patenting has grown especially fast for so-called complex technologies – that is, technologies consisting of many separately patentable inventions where patent ownership is often widespread. This partly reflects technological change. For example, complex technologies include most information and communications technologies that have seen rapid advances over the past decades.
At the same time, some complex technology industries – notably, telecommunications, software, audiovisual technology, optics and, more recently, smartphones and tablet computers – have seen firms strategically build up large patent portfolios. As a result, there is concern that increasingly dense webs of overlapping patent rights slow cumulative innovation processes. Collaborative approaches, such as patent pools, can to some extent address such concerns. However, making sure that crowded patent landscapes do not hold back innovation and entrepreneurship demands careful attention by policymakers.
  • In this regard, well-functioning patent institutions have become a cornerstone of successful innovation systems. They perform the essential tasks of ensuring the quality of patents granted and providing balanced dispute resolution. Unprecedented levels of patenting have put these institutions under considerable pressure. Many patent offices have seen growing backlogs of pending applications. In 2010, the number of unprocessed applications worldwide stood at 5.17 million. The choices patent offices make can have far-reaching consequences on incentives to innovate.
  • Many countries have put in place policies to harness public research for innovation. One element of such policies is to incentivize patenting by university and public research organizations (PROs) and the subsequent commercial development of their inventions. Accordingly, there has been a marked increase in patent applications by these organizations. University and PRO filings under the WIPO’s Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) have grown from close to zero in the 1980s to more than 15,000 in 2010. High-income economies account for most of this growth – notably France, Germany, Japan, the UK and the US. However, many middle income countries have also seen marked growth. In the case of universities, China leads with 2,348 PCT filings from 1980 to 2010, followed by Brazil, India and South Africa. In the case of PROs, China and India alone represent 78 percent of total fillings from middle-income countries.
Policy reforms aimed at promoting patent-based university technology transfer have multifaceted effects on research institutions, firms, the science system and the economy.

Other conclusions of the Report include:

  • While high-income countries still dominate global R&D spending, the geography of innovation has shifted. Global R&D expenditures almost doubled in real terms from 1993 to 2009. Most R&D spending still takes place in high-income countries – around 70 percent of the world total. They spend around 2.5 percent of their gross domestic product (GDP) on R&D, more than double the rate of middle-income economies. Low- and middle-income economies have increased their share of global R&D expenditure by 13 percentage points between 1993 and 2009. China accounts for most of this increase – more than 10 percentage points – propelling China to the world’s second largest R&D spender in 2009.
  • Data on broader investment in intangible assets are only available for selected high income countries. They show that such investment has grown rapidly; in a number of countries, firms now invest more in intangible than in tangible assets. In Europe, investment in intangibles amount to as much as 9.1 percent of GDP in Sweden and the UK.
  • There is clear evidence that innovation is increasingly international with a sharp increase in the share of peer-reviewed science and engineering articles with international co-authorship and a rising share of patents which list inventors from more than one country. In addition, multinational firms more and more locate their R&D facilities in a variety of countries – with certain middle-income economies seeing particularly fast growth. The rising share of middle-income countries in the global economy, in turn, is re-orienting innovation towards the demands of those countries.
  • Some evidence exists that innovation has become more collaborative and open, but assessing the true scale and importance of new approaches is challenging. For one, it is difficult to draw a clear distinction between open innovation strategies and long-standing collaborative practices, such as joint R&D, joint marketing or strategic partnerships. For another, certain elements of open innovation strategies – such as new policies internal to firms or informal knowledge exchanges – cannot easily be traced.
  • Notwithstanding this uncertainty, collaboration in the innovation process can benefit firms and society. Joint IP production occurs through R&D alliances, in particular contractual partnerships and equity-based joint ventures. Data on such alliances are limited and sometimes difficult to interpret, but they suggest that firms in the ICT, biotechnology, and chemical industries most frequently enter into such alliances. Society usually benefits from such collaboration as it enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of the innovation process.

Download

  • Full Report
  • Introduction
  • Table of Contents
  • Chapter 1: The changing nature of innovation and intellectual property
  • Chapter 2: The economics of intellectual property – old insights and new evidence
  • Chapter 3: Balancing collaboration and competition
  • Chapter 4: Harnessing public research for innovation – the role of intellectual property
  • Acronyms

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Innovation and Productivity in México

This TC will supply inputs to a Technical Note "Innovation and Productivity" to feed the process of elaborating the Country Strategy for Mexico 2012-2016.

Basic Information

Project NumberME-T1187
Operation NumberATN/KF-12997-ME
CountryMexico
SectorScience and Technology
SubsectorScience and Technology
Project TypeTechnical Cooperation
Project SubtypeCT/Fondo Trust Funds
StatusApproved
Approval DateNOV 14, 2011

Financial Information

Estimated Total CostUSD 100,000

Estimated IDB Financing

Financing TypeNonreimbursable
FundKEF
Reporting currencyUSD - United States Dollars
AmountUSD 100,000

Roles & Responsibilities

Executing Agency Inter-american Development Bank

Documents


Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Transnational innovation systems



This paper discusses the concept of transnational innovation systems (TNIS) and presents some experiences in Europe in the formation of TNIS. The real cases show that supporting the emergence of Transnational Innovation Systems has clear benefits for the countries and the regions involved which may be related to the enlargement of consumer, labour and factor markets, enhanced competition, extended division of labour and increased specialization (Lundquist and Trippl, 2011: 3).

Regional integration across borders can therefore be of high importance for small and emerging economies, where resources are scarce and markets are not large enough to support and stimulate innovation, like Central America. The paper concludes with some recommendations on how policy makers can facilitate the emergence and development of TNIS.

Cristina Chaminade y Hjalti Nielse. LC/MEXL.1041.Serie 133.Noviembre 2011.Serie Estudios y Perspectivas.Nº133.39 pp.

Monday, November 14, 2011

Mexico. Innovation for Competitiveness Project

Ratings for the Innovation for Competitiveness Project for Mexico were as follows: outcomes were satisfactory, risk to development outcome was low or negligible, Bank performance was satisfactory, and borrower performance was also satisfactory.
Some lessons learned included: clear communication is needed with potential beneficiaries about the availability and characteristics of funding mechanisms. Frequent changes in such mechanisms can be confusing for potential applicants. CONACYT (Consejo Nacional de Evaluacion de la Politica de Desarrollo Social - National Council for the Evaluation of Social Development Policies) made a number of changes to its programs and instruments during the life of the Project.
This was positive in the sense that it was striving to continually improve, but generated confusion amongst many actual or potential beneficiaries interviewed during project supervision. The outcome indicators should not have only conceptual relevance to the project development objectives but also have realistic causal links with project activities and be realistic with respect to the time it takes for some government interventions to produce the expected results, particularly when it comes to private investment decisions. In addition, realistic monitoring mechanisms should be determined during project preparation and implemented at the start of the project.
Periodic beneficiary surveys are needed to track the results of project grants in real time, rather than just at the end of the project Beneficiary surveys that are solely conducted online run the risk of getting a low response rate. For this reason, any online component should be complemented by personal interviews with beneficiaries to ensure that a critical mass of complete responses is obtained. In more developed client countries such as Mexico, knowledge services are seen as a key reason for engagement with the Bank.
For instance, the government considered a study tour organized by the Bank team for high-ranking officials from the Ministry of Economy and CONACYT to Washington, DC to be a very worthwhile learning experience. The study tour highlighted models of how Mexico could strengthen its innovation system at the national and state levels and Mexican officials were able to make strategic connections with their counterparts in the U.S.
Document Date: 2011/06/24. Document Type: Implementation Completion and Report Number: ICR1718. Volume No: 1 of 1







Wednesday, November 9, 2011

FY2011 Innovative Drug Approvals

FDA is approving innovative drugs earlier and faster than any other country in the world, while at the same time making sure that Americans’ medicines are safe and effective.
Over the last several years, FDA has improved the quality and speed of its drug approval process, making new treatments available for millions of Americans suffering from various serious health problems.
In Fiscal Year 2011 FDA approved 35 innovative drugs that offered important advances in treatment for hepatitis C, late-stage prostate cancer, lupus, drug resistant skin infections, pneumonia, and other serious and life-threatening diseases. This is among the highest number of approvals in the past decade, surpassed only by 2009 (37).
The report, FY 2011 Innovative Drug Approvals, provides details of how FDA used expedited approval authorities, flexible clinical trial requirements and resources collected under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) to boost the number of innovative drug approvals.

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Effects of licensing reform on firm innovation : evidence from India

The regulatory environment in a country can affect firm performance. This study investigates the impact of a particular regulation, namely license requirements for certain firm activities, on the innovation performance of Indian firms.

First it presents a model of firm and industry evolution that explains the dynamics of multi-product firms. Then, using a firm level panel data set, it shows that removal of license requirements led to roughly 5 percentage points faster innovation rates where innovation is measured as introduction of new product varieties that had not existed in the market.

The results are robust to inclusion of controls for the other policy reforms that occurred during the period of licensing reform.

World Bank. Author: Seker,Murat;Document Date: 2011/11/01.Document Type:Policy Research Working Paper.Report Number: WPS5876.Volume No: 1 of 1

28 pages
Official Version
[1.96 mb]

Text Version*