Showing posts with label green economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label green economy. Show all posts

Friday, January 13, 2012

IDB approves $30 million investment in green fund for Latin America and the Caribbean


Jan 13, 2012.The Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) has approved a $30 million loan for the Emerging Energy Latin America Fund II, designed to boost the private sector as a driving force in clean technologies and renewable energy in the region.

“This financing is part of the IDB’s commitment to develop mechanisms to support long-term funding of renewable energy and clean technology projects in the region, which stimulate innovation, job creation and green economic growth,” said Daniela Carrera-Marquis, head of the Financial Markets Division at the IDB's Structured and Corproate Finance Department (SCF).

Latin America and the Caribbean are expected to see their energy demand increase by 75 percent by 2030, and renewable energy could account for half of that total demand, according to Andrés Ackermann, the IDB project team leader .

The new fund will invest in renewable energy projects including wind, solar, small hydropower and geothermal, and in energy services companies using clean technologies, including waste-management, biomass, energy efficiency and smart-grid projects. The IDB’s support of the fund fits in with the Bank’s commitment to help mitigate the impact of climate change.

The fund will be managed by Stamford, Connecticut-based Emerging Energy and Environment, LLC (EEE), which specializes in clean and renewable energy, clean technologies, climate change and environment and low-carbon infrastructure investments and advisory services.

The IDB loan is expected to be supplemented by contributions from equity investors to include International Finance Institutions and other local and international capital sources.

The eventual size of the Emerging Energy Latin America Fund II is targeted at approximately $150 million. The Emerging Energy Latin America Fund II is the successor to a previous CleanTech Fund, an earlier stage $25.2 million fund that had a similar focus on renewable energy and clean technology and was supported by the IDB’s Multilateral Investment Fund (MIF).

“We are pleased to partner once again with the IDB Group and work together to provide important resources to reach a common objective of promoting green investments, supporting a more sustainable region,” said John Paul Moscarella, Founder and Senior Managing Director of Emerging Energy Latin America Fund II.


RG-L1033:Emerging Energy Latin America Fund II, L.P. Project Description: The purpose of Emerging Energy Latin America Fund II, L.P. is to make investments in a diversified portfolio of renewable energy and clean technology companies in Latin American and the Caribbean.IDB¿s participation will consist of a senior A loan of up to US$30 million with a tenor consistent with the life of the fund (expected at 10 years), including a 5-year commitment period. The repayment structure and the scope of security will be defined during due-diligence.

x

Thursday, January 12, 2012

Global Organizations to Expand Cooperation on Green Growth for Development


OECD. January 11, 2012. Governments looking to design and implement green growth policies and move towards a green economy now have a new source of information and assistance. Four leading global organizations today signed a Memorandum of Understanding to create the Green Growth Knowledge Platform, a cutting edge global initiative that will identify and address major knowledge gaps in green growth theory and practice. The agreement was signed by the Global Green Growth Institute, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations Environment Programme, and the World Bank.

“This MoU marks the formal launch of essential international cooperation on testing, exploring, and refining policies and actions on green growth for practical implementation in both developed and developing countries,” said Richard Samans, Executive Director of the Global Green Growth Institute.

The coming decade will offer major opportunities for synergy between environmental and economic sustainability. For example, developing countries can factor “green” into their new investments in infrastructure and can further develop agriculture and other natural resources to improve livelihoods, create jobs, and reduce poverty.

“Governments seeking to re-ignite growth after the crisis,” said OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, “should harness innovation, investment, and entrepreneurship to drive the shift to greener economies. We must intensify our efforts to move towards green growth to preserve natural capital and reduce pollution. It will be essential to avoid path dependency by breaking old habits of consumption and investing in new technology and infrastructure. The Green Growth Knowledge Platform will be key for facilitating collaboration among our four institutions, to provide governments with the best possible tools to achieve this goal.”

The Green Growth Knowledge Platform will improve local, national, and global economic policy-making around the world by providing rigorous and relevant analysis of the various synergies and tradeoffs between the economy and the environment. It will complement other efforts by emphasizing policy instruments that yield local environmental co-benefits while stimulating growth, providing a compelling set of incentives for governments.

Sylvie Lemmet, Director of UNEP's Division of Technology, Industry and Economics, said, "The Platform offers new opportunities to push the envelope on how a green economy transition can generate jobs and income, while producing positive impacts on the environment and setting a new threshold for enhanced global cooperation towards accelerating and scaling up sustainable development."

The MoU signing took place on the eve of the inaugural Green Growth Knowledge Platform conference. The conference, with more than 120 leading scholars and practitioners, has been organized in partnership with Mexico to:

take stock of the current understanding of the economics of green growth;

engage researchers and practitioners in an ongoing dialogue to increase understanding of how green growth approaches can be applied in the field;

identify knowledge gaps and establish priorities for knowledge-building work and implementation; and

launch follow-on efforts.

“This conference is taking an important step in convening a community of experts and practitioners to develop a shared, evidence-based vision of the contributions greener growth can make to sustainable development,” said Rachel Kyte, Vice President for Sustainable Development at the World Bank. “By joining forces and sharing data, we can equip policy makers everywhere with better tools to manage the choices and trade-offs that greener and more inclusive growth may entail.”

The MoU signing and conference are the first steps toward the Green Growth Knowledge Platform’s efforts to shape the global knowledge agenda for green growth. Moving forward, the Platform will organize new research programs around a handful of priority themes to be identified later this week, as well as cultivate a dynamic global community of green growth researchers and practitioners. 

Contacts:
In Washington (World Bank): Roger Morier, +1 202 473 5675; rmorier@worldbank.org;
In Paris (OECD): Nathalie Girouard, +33 1 45 24 84 82, Nathalie.Girouard@oecd.org;
In Paris (UNEP): Moira O’Brien-Malone, +33 1 44 37 76 12, moira.obrien-malone@unep.org
In Seoul (GGGI): Michael Sullivan, +82 70 7117 9965, m.sullivan@gggi.org


The Green Growth Knowledge Platform is a global network of researchers and development experts that identifies and addresses major knowledge gaps in green growth theory and practice. Through widespread consultation and world-class research, GGKP provides practitioners and policymakers with better tools to foster economic growth and implement sustainable development.


x

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Working towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy

ITU. december, 17. Against a backdrop of the multiple crises of the past four years -- financial, economic, food and energy -- the United Nations launched this week a report that offers UN agencies and its member states guidance for coordinating the transition to a Green Economy at the international and country levels. In the first-ever inter-agency report on the Green Economy, the Environment Management Group (EMG), representing the work of UN agencies, the Bretton Woods Institutions and other intergovernmental bodies outlines steps and policies for pursuing a green economic transformation that generates new sources of sustainable and equitable economic growth that will assist in a global economic recovery.  

Such action will require investing in natural capital, clean-technologies, such as information and communication technologies (ICTs), as well as in in human and social capital, including education, health care, cultural development and social protection. The report, Working towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy, reflects a growing recognition of the shortcomings of business-as-usual practiced by both the public and private sector institutions over the last two decades and assesses how the UN system can coherently support countries in transitioning to a Green Economy. The report highlights the need for more integrated approaches between different international agencies and government departments, as well as more targeted investments across the environmental, economic and social domains. 

Urging both agencies and governments to use the forthcoming 2012 UN Conference on Sustainable Development (or Rio+20 Summit) to turn their commitments into reality, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said:  
“United Nations entities are keenly aware of the resource challenges that countries face in meeting the needs of a growing and urbanizing world population. The human and economic toll of natural disasters and the volatility of commodity prices reflect worrying trends in global climate change, the growing scarcity of some natural resources and the decline of many ecosystems.   

“This report highlights how these challenges can and must be addressed as part of integrated development models that focus on poverty and human well-being.” 

The report promotes a UN system-wide understanding of the Green Economy approach to achieve sustainable development and offers a range of instruments that governments can use to impact investment choices and consumer behavior.  These include mobilizing financial resources, full cost pricing, regulatory instruments, sustainable trade and green markets, innovation and technology, and indicators for measuring progress towards transition. 

The report calls specifically for public spending to target green infrastructure and research and development that can spur green technologies and innovation, as well as better health care and education. In addition, governments need to align their laws, regulations, green standards, taxes, labeling and reporting requirements to reinforce the incentives for the private sector to direct their finance and investments towards green, responsible business and a Green Economy. 

The report notes numerous UN-backed initiatives, including ITU’s activities to promote green ICT standards, the use of radio-communications for earth observation, or specific initiatives to develop innovative applications that promote the transition to a green economy, such as the ITU Green ICT Application Challenge. These contributions will be instrumental in the preparation of the Rio+20 conference.

x

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Climate change aid up to USD 22.9 billion in 2010, says OECD’s Gurría

06/12/2011- New data show that the member countries of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) allocated up to USD 22.9 billion, or 15% of total official development assistance (ODA), to climate change mitigation and adaptation in developing countries in 2010. With the latest round of negotiations on the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change now underway in Durban, South Africa, governments are discussing how to scale up, deliver and better direct international public climate finance.
“Measurement of climate-related development aid by the OECD is an important contribution to the tracking of climate financing”, said OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría.  “We have been tracking aid in support of mitigation since 1998. This is the first time we are also reporting on support for adaptation to have a more complete picture of climate change related aid. Going forward, we urge donors to step up bringing in both mitigation and adaptation considerations into their development policies”.
One-third of the estimated climate-change-related aid in 2010 went to support adaptation (USD 9.3 billion) while two-thirds was for mitigation (USD 17.6 billion, up 69% from 2009). These estimates reflect aid activities in which climate change mitigation or adaptation was either the principal or a significant objective.  About 60% of the total climate-related aid had mitigation or adaptation as the principal objective.
In certain cases, funds can be tagged as both mitigation and adaptation-related, so it is important to avoid double-counting. Of the total USD 22.9 billion in finance, an estimated USD 4 billion supported both mitigation and adaptation objectives.
All OECD aid data are publicly available, bringing transparency and accountability to what countries and multilateral institutions are doing in this area.

Aid to climate change adaptation and mitigation 2010

Recent trends in aid related to mitigation (2006 – 2010)

Source: OECD Development Assistance Committee – CRS, Rio Markers series

 The OECD has been working on climate change economics and policy since the late 1980s to identify and implement least-cost policy responses. Besides tracking climate-related aid, the OECD is urging countries to reform domestic policies to support climate action.  It is also advising governments on how to design and use innovative financial instruments – such as green bonds – to attract new sources of capital, including from pension funds and other institutional investors. The OECD has also recently launched the climate change chapter of the Environmental Outlook to 2050 and is implementing its Green Growth Strategy.

For more information on OECD work on development assistance and climate change (the Rio Markers) visit www.oecd.org/dac/stats/rioconventions, where detailed, final, project-by-project data will be available soon.

For more information on OECD work on climate change finance, see the climate change finance flyer; or visit: www.oecd.org/env/cc/financing and www.oecd.org/cop17

,

Thursday, December 1, 2011

OECD Green Growth Studies: Energy

A fundamental transformation is required in the way we produce, deliver and consume energy. The current energy system is highly dependent on fossil fuels, whose combustion accounted for 84% of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2009. Global demand for energy is rapidly increasing, because of population and economic growth, especially in large emerging market economies, which will account for 90% of energy demand growth to 2035. At the same time, 1.3 billion people worldwide still lack access to electricity.

The OECD and IEA have released the joint report Green Growth Studies: Energy, which highlights the challenges facing energy producers and users, and how they can be addressed using green growth policies.

Introduction

Energy is a fundamental input to economic activity. Modern energy services light up our homes and schools, fuel economic activity to produce and consume, provide comfort and mobility, pump water and contribute to health and well-being. Harnessing energy sources to replace manual and animal labour was the platform of the Industrial Revolution: a period of unprecedented economic and social development.

The 20th century witnessed large increases in the global population, economic output and fossil fuel consumption. The gains from growth have been impressive for many. Yet these gains have taken a toll on a range of environmental systems where unsustainable practices have dominated. Continuing deterioration of natural resources could stress the ability to meet the needs of a growing population and undermine economic activity. Green growth could meet this challenge. Green growth is about fostering economic growth and development while ensuring that natural assets continue to provide the ecosystem services on which our well-being relies. To do this it must catalyse investment and innovation which will underpin sustained growth and give rise to new economic opportunities.

The energy sector poses a particular challenge in the context of green growth due to its size, complexity, path dependency and reliance on long-lived assets.

The current energy system is highly dependent on fossil fuels, whose combustion accounted for 84% of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2009. Global demand for energy is rapidly increasing, due to population and economic growth, especially in large emerging countries, which will account for 90% of energy demand growth to 2035. At the same time, nearly 20% of the global population lack access to electricity. A major transformation is required in the way we produce, deliver and consume energy.

A large-scale transformation of the global energy sector is possible, though it will require significant investment. Global emissions could be halved by 2050, using existing and emerging technologies at an additional cumulative investment of USD 46 trillion. It is vital for governments to create the enabling
policy framework to catalyse private-sector investment in the transition to a low-carbon energy sector. It is cheaper in the long-term to act now, as every USD 1 of energy sector investment not spent before 2020 will require an additional USD 4.3 to be spent after 2020 to compensate for increased greenhouse gas
emissions by building zero-carbon plants and infrastructure by 2035.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1. Transforming the energy sector to sustain growthGreen growth requires a green engine
Addressing systemic risks and imbalances
Global energy outlook
Implications of continuing current trends

Chapter 2. Promoting the transition to green growthGreen growth and energy: What’s at stake
Potential trade-offs and adjustment costs
Key technologies for green growth and energy
A policy framework for greening energy
Policies for green growth in specific energy sectors
Chapter 3. Implementing green energy: Reshaping the political economyPolitical economy – achieving change in different country contexts
Structural adjustment
Stranded capital
Employment effects
Distributional effects

Chapter 4. Monitoring progress towards green growthThe OECD framework for green growth indicators
Energy related green growth indicators



a

Saturday, November 26, 2011

Near-term Climate Protection and Clean Air Benefits:Actions for Controlling Short-Lived Climate Forcers

London/Nairobi, 25 November 2011. A package of 16 measures could, if fully implemented across the globe, save close to 2.5 million lives a year; avoid crop losses amounting to 32 million tonnes annually and deliver near-term climate protection of about half a degree C by 2040.
The report estimates that implementing these measures would help keep a global temperature rise below the 2 degrees C target, at least until mid-century.
The measures, outlined in a new report compiled by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) with an international team of experts, target short-lived climate forcers (SLCFs)—black carbon which is a major component of soot, methane and tropospheric ozone.

The report emphasizes that fast action on short-lived climate forcers will not be able to keep global temperature rise to under 2 degrees C by the end of the century, unless governments decisively act on the principle greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide (CO2).

The report, funded by the Government of Sweden, estimates that around half of the black carbon and methane emission reductions can be achieved through measures that result in cost savings over the lifetime of the investment.

This is because some of the measures—such as recovering rather than emitting natural gas during oil production—allow the methane to be harvested as a clean source of fuel.

Cutting black carbon emissions by, for example, replacing inefficient cookstoves and traditional brick kilns with more efficient ones, also cuts fuel costs for households and kiln operators.

The report points to other economic, social and environmental benefits that are not included in the overall cost-estimates of this assessment. These include:

Upgrading wastewater treatment works will help cut emissions of methane, while improving sanitation and water quality.

Recovery of coal mine methane - carried out for occupational safety reasons as well as for the economic value of methane as a clean-burning energy source - will have significant climate and health benefits.

The report has been requested by developed and developing countries and builds on some ten years of scientific research, first, through the UNEP Atmospheric Brown Cloud project, and more recently via assessments by UNEP and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).

In June this year, UNEP and the WMO released their Integrated Assessment of Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone report, underlining the likely health, agricultural and climate benefits of fast action on these pollutants.

The June report also spotlighted the link between methane emissions and the formation of tropospheric ozone, concluding that methane is contributing by around 50 per cent to increases in background ozone concentrations world-wide.

This, in part, explains why the concentrations of tropospheric ozone in the northern hemisphere have tripled over the past 100 years.

Indeed, tropospheric ozone has become the third most important contributor to man-made climate change, after carbon dioxide and methane itself.

Tropospheric ozone also reduces crop yields and damages human health, when inhaled.

Black carbon, together with other components of particulate matter - emitted as a result of inefficient burning from a wide range of sources, including cook stoves and diesel engines - is a major cause of premature deaths, resulting from outdoor and indoor pollution.

It is also likely to heat up the atmosphere and, when deposited onto ice caps and glaciers, can accelerate melting because less sunlight is reflected back into space.

Fast action on short-lived climate forcers could significantly cut the rate of warming in the Arctic and reduce projected warming in 2040 by 0.7 degrees C, with important implications for the lives and livelihoods of Arctic peoples, biodiversity and global sea-level rise.

Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director, said: “The scientific case for fast action on these so-called ‘Short-Lived Climate Forcers’ has been steadily built over more than a decade—the question governments have been asking over recent months is what are the options and
priorities for action and the likely costs and benefits in order to advance a response to rapidly manage these substances.”

“This report provides that analysis and offers pathways and policies that may allow nations, acting nationally, regionally and globally, to achieve some remarkable gains in terms of a transition to a low emission, resource efficiente
Green Economy over the near term.”

“For some countries the most important benefits result from cost-effective improvements in air pollution and reduced illness and loss of life—black carbon, for example, could be controlled under national and regional air quality agreements. Other countries are also recognizing the food security benefits in terms of reduced crop damage in a world of seven billion people,” said Mr. Steiner.

“For others, it may be the regional and global climate benefits that are uppermost in their minds—whatever the motivation, this report presents the costs and the benefits that can play their part towards a sustainable 21st century as governments head towards Rio+20 in June, next year,” he added.

Key Options for Fast Action to Implement Measure to Reduce SLCFs

Fast action on short lived climate forcers will be required to deliver climate change, health and agricultural benefits over the near term.

The report groups actions into four categories based on relative costs, while also looking at regional benefits and regional sources of the different pollutants.

The 16 measure identified in the report are organized into four categories, based on their relative cost. All have been tried and tested to varying levels in a variety of countries. For example, most European countries have already banned the burning of agricultural wastes, which can be expanded to other regions.
More efficient cookstoves are already being introduced in many parts of the world, including West Africa, China and India.

Emissions standards, such as the Euro 6/VI, are being introduced for vehicles in Europe and other members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as well as in some non-OECD countries.

Black Carbon

In total, nine priority measures are identified for reducing black carbon emissions, with substantial benefits to health and the environment
A switch from traditional biomass cookstoves to more efficient fan-assisted ones, or stoves fueled by Liquefied Petroleum Gas or biogas, offers the biggest reduction potential in Africa, Asia Pacific and, to some extent, in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Action on cookstoves is also pinpointed as a low cost or cost-saving measure, which would represent close to 25 per cent of the total climate benefit, achievable through the full implementation of all 16 measures on short-lived climate forcers.

A switch to more efficient cookstoves would save householders and communities the time and money, usually spent over the collection and purchase of firewood and other sources of fuel.

The cost of replacing traditional cookstoves with more environmentally-friendly ones may seem low by international standards. However, from the perspective of local users in developing countries, this cost may represent a financial burden. The report looks at ways to overcome such barriers and to link the implementation of such measures to national development plans.

Replacing conventional residential wood burning stoves in North America and Europe with pellet stoves and boilers would also offer important black carbon cuts—estimated at close to 2 per cent of the overall climate benefits.

Replacing traditional brick kilns with more efficient ones could trigger cost savings equal to around $7 a tonnes of CO2 equivalent.

Vertical-shaft brick kilns use about half the energy and, hence half the fuel costs, per brick made compared to the traditional kilns. Methane Cuts to Reduce

Tropospheric Ozone
In respect to methane, seven measures are identified.

The biggest cuts would come from reducing emissions from coal mines and processes related to the production and transport of oil and gas, as well from as the capture of methane from landfill sites.

Globally, nearly 50 per cent of the methane reduction potential can be achieved through measures that will give rise to cost savings over the lifetime of the investment. Cost estimates were calculated according to two different perspectives:

A social planning perspective, where investment in black carbon and methane capture measures constitutes a long-term benefit for society and where cost savings are discounted over the lifetime of the investment.

A private business perspective, which expects a more rapid return on investment and where the implementation of black carbon and methane reduction measures may prove challenging, without adequate access to financing.

In North America, Europe and elsewhere separation and treatment of the biodegradable portion of municipal waste has important benefits—globally, this amounts to close to 10 per cent of the climate benefits linked with fast action.

Further benefits can arise in parts of Asia from exposing continuously flooded rice paddies intermittently to the air under improved management systems, as is now practiced in parts of China—globally, the climate benefits as a proportion of action on short-lived climate forcers is just over three per cent.

The report outlines national actions that can assist in fast-tracking efforts to reduce short-lived climate forcers, ranging from tax incentives, regulation, public education and subsidizes or loans on, for example, improved cookstoves.

Regional actions can include controlling pollutants, such as black carbon, under regional air quality agreements. For example, the UN Economic Commission for Europe’s Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution and its Gothenburg Protocol are currently being reviewed for the possible inclusion of black carbon, as a component of particulate matter.

Globally, there are opportunities for complementary actions that support international treaties, such as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, in respect to methane and tropospheric ozone.

Convening international organizations around common near-term climate protection objectives could be a powerful way of integrating existing initiatives, reducing duplication and inefficient use of resources, while leading to more effective SLCFs mitigation in different sectors, worldwide.

Contacts
Nick Nuttall, UNEP Division of Communication and Public Information Acting Director and Spokesman, tel. +41 795 965 737 or +254 733 632 755;
nick.nuttall@unep.org, or,
Shereen Zorba, Head, UNEP News Desk, tel. +254 78852 6000;
unepnewsdesk@unep.org.


h

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

South Africa’s Pursuit of Green Economy Offers Major Economic and Environmental Benefits

World Bank.News Release No:2012/161/AFR. Johannesburg, November 22, 2011– The pursuit of green policies can have major direct environmental and economic benefits for South Africa, but the costs of transition to a green economy  should be carefully weighed against the benefits argues a new World Bank report released today.
 
The report, written against the backdrop of slowing global economic prospects  shows how the South African economy, with its close links to the world economy, has suffered, leading to a lower 2011 GDP forecast of 3.2 percent, down from the 3.5 percent projected in an earlier update.  For 2012 and 2013, the report forecasts  3.1 and 3.7 percent growth rate respectively, down from the 4.1 and 4.4 percent of the earlier report released in July 2011.

“The report finds that green policies can also have significant co-benefits with growth and jobs but these are not automatic and need to be backed by complementary reforms” said Ruth Kagia, World Bank Country Director for South Africa.  “However, green policies are not a ‘silver bullet,’ and they cannot be a substitute for pro-growth, job-boosting policies just as fast growth cannot replace the need for well-designed environmental policies.”

The policy objectives of pursuing a greener economy and green growth are laudable and there are strong economic and environmental benefits to be reaped. However, such policy reforms invariably involve costs and tradeoffs.  The report takes a hard look at the entire spectrum of green economy issues and offers fresh insights with a view to informing policymaking for broad-based growth and sustained poverty reduction.

“Green growth means fostering economic growth and development,while protecting natural assets,” said Milan Brahmbhatt and Michael Toman, World Bank Senior Advisor and Research Manager respectively, co-authors of the report. “But natural capital is nearly always overused because it lacks a price that reflects the social cost of depletion due to market or policy failures. Rectifying such failures is key to securing long-term sustainability of the resource base and people’s well-being.”

The report recommends that policymakers make choices in ways that fully reflect social costs and benefits of natural capital.  Faster growth needs to be accompanied by stronger environmental protection.

The report cautions that there is no single policy lever that by itself will deliver both growth and environmental protection.  There are important synergies to be derived between growth and the environment and that these are likely larger when growth and environment policies are well coordinated. 

In Pretoria:
Sarwat Hussain
shussain@worldbank.org
Tel: +27 12 742 3124
Mmenyane Seoposengwemseoposengwe@worldbank.org
Tel: 073 888 4598
In Washington:
Aby K. Toure
Tel: (202) 473-8302
akonate@worldbank.org

Monday, November 21, 2011

UNEP and China launch joint initiative to promote ecosystem management

UNEP NEWS CENTRE. 11/18/2011. Beijing.The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) today co-organized a High-level International Forum on Ecosystem Management and Green Economy. The forum aimed to contribute to the success of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, popularly known as Eio+20, by highlighting the pivotal role of ecosystem management in the development of a Green Economy in China and other developing countries. For this, the Forum has come out with a communiqué which recognizes this role and recommends actions to be taken at Rio+20.
The forum was attended by over 200 participants, including heads of UN and other international organizations, leaders and ministers from the Chinese Government, renowned scientists, business leaders and representatives of the civil society.

Addressing the forum, Mr. Zukang Sha, UN Under Secretary General in charge of the UNDepartment of Economic and Social Affairs and Secretary General of Rio+20, pointed out that the Forum's outputs would form a key input to Rio+20, in the context of the urgent need to protect and restore the world's ecosystems.
Mr. Sha recognized that ecosystems are the foundations of human life and livelihoods, but for too long, humanity has ignored this fundamental truth at its own peril, and the Earth ecosystems have been altered more rapidly and extensively than ever before. He stressed that the sustainable management of ecosystems will play a critical role in advancing green economies worldwide.
This week the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) launched its flagship report in Beijing entitled, Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. The Report demonstrates that governments and businesses alike are taking steps to accelerate a global shift towards a low-carbon, resource-efficient and socially inclusive green future.
In his opening remarks, Mr. Achim Steiner, UN Under Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director, pointed out that the Green Economy is an opportunity for developing countries, including China, to create economic and job opportunities.
Mr. Steiner highlighted the critical role that ecosystem management plays in the development of a Green Economy, quoting examples from, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), a broad partnership hosted by UNEP, which has supported the analysis of UNEP's Green Economy Report and which is a major international initiative to draw attention to the global economic benefits of biodiversity as well as to highlight the multi-trillion dollar costs of biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation.

Mr. Steiner stressed the timeliness of this Forum, in the context of the upcoming UN Climate Change Conference in Durban and Rio+20 in Brazil in June, and hoped that the Forum would offer an opportunity to produce value-added recommendations, including the need for renewed political commitment at Rio+20 which would give ecosystem management the political weight and significance it deserves.

Vice President Ding from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) pointed out that in Chinese culture harmony between humans and nature was of utmost importance and that this has been reflected in the Chinese Government's policies in recent years where the focus has been the development and advancement of the ecological civilization.

Mr. Ding lauded UNEP's efforts in developing concepts such as Ecosystem Based Adaptation (EBA), Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) and the Green Economy, all of which play critical roles in the development of an eco-civilization.

China's Vice Minister of Environmental Protection, Mr. Ganjie Li, told participants that China is keen on contributing to the development of a global eco-civilization. He pointed out China's policies, including those of eco-zoning and eco-compensations, demonstrate this commitment.

In his address, Professor Honglie Sun, Academician of CAS and Director of the Advisory Committee of Chinese Ecosystem Research Network (CERN), outlined the history of ecological study in China. He emphasized on the need for ecological networks, such as CERN, which support policy making and suggested CERN as an important infrastructure in assisting other developing countries in establishing similar networks.

The day-long forum brought together a wide range of experts from across the world, including Sir Crispin Tickell from the United Kingdom, Julia Marton-Lefevre, Director General of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Professor Richard Odingo from Kenya, Dr. Arthur Hanson, International Chief Advisor of the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development (CCICED), Björn Roland Stigson, President of World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), Lars-Erik Liljelund, Executive Director of The Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research and Franz Tattenbach, President of the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)

Through intensive discussions, participants of the Forum reached the following conclusions:

The Earth's ecosystems are the natural foundation of human civilization. A robust, healthy and sustainable ecosystem is a prerequisite to secure the development of a Green Economy.
Ecosystems have been profoundly degraded over the last 50 years and pressure on them continues unabated. Some of the key ecological processes have exceeded their thresholds, which may lead to the collapse of some vulnerable ecosystems. This poses threats to lives, livelihoods and economic development and demands urgent action.
Concrete evidences show that ecosystem management can halt and reverse this increasing degradation of ecosystems. It can also provide economic and job opportunities, particularly for developing countries.
There is clear evidence that many key issues of the Green Economy development are critical for addressing ecosystem management.
There are already ecological networks, mechanisms, methods and tools in place to promote the role of ecosystem management for development of the Green Economy.

Based on the key findings reflected through an issues paper, the Forum has proposed the following recommendations to be acted on at the Rio+20 summit:

1. Political commitment at the highest level is urgently needed if ecosystem management is to have the adequate weight it deserves in the Rio+20 arrangement;

2. Political support and appropriate governance structures are needed for improved synergies between ecosystem management and the Green Economy in developing Rio+20 policy frameworks;

3. Adequate financial, technological and knowledge resources must be allocated, including in national policy-setting, awareness-raising, capacity-building and planning and practices, particularly in developing countries;

4. Building capacity and ecological infrastructure in developing countries, such as Africa, is a prerequisite for enhancing ecosystem management and promoting the Green Economy.
For More Information, Please Contact:
Dhanush Dinesh, International Ecosystem Management Partnership-UNEP,
Tel/Fax: +86 10 64857067, Email:
Dhanush.Dinesh@unep-iemp.org
Guoqin Wang, International Ecosystem Management Partnership-UNEP,
Tel/Fax: +86 10 64889031, Email:
guoqin.wang@unep-iemp.org
Jiang Nanqing, UNEP China Office, Tel. +86-10-85320922, Fax: +86-10-85320907
Email:
nanqing.jiang@public.un.org.cn

Notes to the Editors
1.What is Ecosystem Management?
Ecosystem Management is "an integrated process to conserve and improve ecosystem health that sustains ecosystem services for human well-being". It places particular emphasis on integrating human needs with conservation practices, and recognizes the inter-connectivity between ecological, socio-cultural, economic and institutional structures in developing solutions. It fosters community ownership of problem resolution efforts to maintain ecosystem services. It uses many different tools and media (such as governance structures and stakeholder engagement, policies and protocols, strategies and practices), guided by principles that help define the management framework that are targeted to achieve multiple benefits of ecosystem restoration, livelihood improvement and job creation. It is based on cross-cutting and apolitical principles that can be applied across a wide range of scales. The approach is increasingly being used by many developing countries and has been written into international agreements.
2. Success of Ecosystem Management in China

China has a long history ecosystem management which can be traced back to 2070-1600 B.C. during the Xia Dynasty. This spirit of nature conservation as such has been part of Chinese culture, however, in modern times there have been phases of unwise management of ecosystems, and restoration and advancement thought lessons are learnt over time. As the world's second largest economy and the most populous country, there are great pressures on ecosystems in China and ecosystem management plays a crucial role in sustaining the well-being of the Chinese people.
China has excellent lessons in ecosystem management which maybe shared with other developing countries with twin issues of conservation and development. There is the case of Grain for Green Programme in the Loess Plateau of China which illustrates this. The Loess Plateau is located in the middle reaches of the Yellow River, encompassing 287 counties in seven provinces. It is the largest area of loess in the world, covering more than 600,000 km2, accounting for 6.6% of China's land area, with 8.5% of the Chinese population. The fragility of the loess ecosystem is characterized by its arid climate, with only 64.1mm of average annual precipitation, which is compounded by high population density of 168 person/km2 and intensive cultivation on the slope land. This intensive cultivation has led to severe soil erosion, with an average erosion rate 5,000-10,000 t/km2/year. As a result, the Yellow River receives a high content of sand entrained in the water leading to siltation of the river channels and reservoirs, which, moreover, raises river beds and increases the risk of flooding. For this reason, controlling soil erosion of the Loess Plateau has been a national priority since the turn of last century.
Starting from 1999, the Chinese Government launched a national "Grain for Green Program" for restoring cropland to forest (or grassland). The Loess Plateau was a priority area for the programme, which includes transforming sloping farmlands into terraces, vegetation rehabilitation, enclosing hills and banning grazing, building dams to trap silt, enhancing basic and high quality farmlands, planting commercial forests and fruit trees, as well as growing fodder and fostering related industries. The programme has achieved remarkable ecological and economic benefits: regional evapo-transpiration has decreased by 6.2% and surface water runoff by 13.6% ; over 153 million tons per year of soil has been retained; and there has been a positive impact on carbon sequestration, with 69.21 TgC in soil, and 23.76 TgC in rehabilitated vegetation (Table 1). Food production rose 18% between 2000 and 2008, achieved through the increase of per-unit food production against a decline of total cropland area. Meanwhile, the Loess Plateau's economic situation has greatly improved. Per capita income in rural areas increased from RMB1000/year in 1998 to more than RMB 3000/year in 2007. As the programme advances, the rural economy has improved with the growing secondary and tertiary industries, which has not only created new jobs for rural labour force, but also diversified sources of household income.

3. Green Economy

UNEP defines a Green Economy as one that results in 'improved human well-being and social equity, while significantly reducing environmental risks and ecological scarcities'. It is a new development path that is based on sustainability and ecological economics. Compared with previous development paths, the uniqueness of a Green Economy is that it can directly turn the natural capital into economic value whilst preserving it, and conduct total cost accounting. This way, the natural capital can be included into the social system, requiring the users of ecosystem services to pay for the benefits gained and damage caused. Ecosystem Management, "an integrated process to conserve and improve ecosystem health that sustains ecosystem services for human well-being," is recommended as the critical approach to restore the natural foundation to sustain a Green Economy.
4. The Pivotal Role of Ecosystem Management for a Green Economy
Ecological networks, mechanisms, methods and tools are to be in place for the development of the Green Economy
Monitoring the state of the Earth's ecosystems, understanding the ecological processes and predicting ecosystem functions are essential approaches for decisions and actions of ecosystem management. This requires integrated ecological networks such as the Chinese Ecosystem Research Network (CERN). Considering the global importance of ecosystem management, there is also the need for establishing an intergovernmental body to improve science-policy interface such as the Inter-Governmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Developing countries share common challenges of ecosystem management as a result of a shortage of capacity, knowledge and information. Therefore there is a need for them to learn from each other.
Valuation of Ecosystem Services improves decision-making
Once the underlying biophysical characteristics of an ecosystem are understood, translating this scientific understanding into values can improve the decision-making of governments, businesses and consumers. One of the failures of our prevailing political and economic systems is that the value of biodiversity and ecosystems is often either entirely ignored or poorly understood.
The TEEB studies recommend a pragmatic, tiered approach to valuation in analyzing problems and developing policy responses. In some cases, it may be sufficient to simply recognize the value of ecosystems and biodiversity to ensure their sustainability. In other cases, it may be necessary to demonstrate the value of ecosystems and biodiversity in economic terms to ensure balanced and informed decision-making. This is particularly true when policymakers and businesses make decisions impacting ecosystems based on a cost and benefit calculation.
Capturing the value through policy and markets
Traditional indicators such as GDP and the HDI have basic limitations as measures of social progress. Neither GDP/capita nor HDI reflect the state of the natural environment and both focus on the short term, with no indication of whether current well-being can be sustained. These are reflected in annual reports of UNDP, IMF and the World Bank. The green economy initiative provides a unique opportunity to guide a new development paradigm that addresses not only economic efficiency but also social equity.

In a Green Economy, the revised and adjusted net national product (NNP) will make economic decision-makers, particularly in developing countries aware of environmental costs. For example, the conventional measure provides the contribution of fisheries and forestry sectors for Brazil, Indonesia and India as 6.1, 14.1 and 16.5 percentage, respectively, but if the ecosystem services are accounted it becomes 17.4, 14.5 and 19.6, respectively.
There also exists market-based approaches to capture the values of ecosystem services into decision making, prominent among these are Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) models, which uses compensatory means to resolve conflicts between natural resources and resource-users.
5. Rio+20 - an opportunity to promote ecosystem management in green economy development
The Earth Summit on sustainable development held in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 adopted the Climate Convention, the Convention on Biodiversity, and the Agenda 21. As 2012 nears, all eyes are set towards the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (UNCSD), popularly known as "Rio+20" whose main objectives are to secure renewed political commitment for sustainable development; assess the progress to date and the remaining gaps in the implementation of the outcomes of the major summits on sustainable development and address new and emerging challenges. UN General Assembly has selected the Green Economy as one of the two themes of Rio+20, which will provide an alternative development path towards global sustainability by addressing social, economic and environmental issues in a more integrated and pragmatic way.

Friday, November 18, 2011

UNEP Co-Hosts Beijing Forum on Ecosystem Management and the Green Economy

On 18 November 2011, UNEP, together with the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), will host the High-level International Forum on Ecosystem Management and the Green Economy in Beijing -an international gathering of experts, scientists and government officials from around the world - to look at ecosystems and their management and the need for a transition to a Green Economy.
These are current and critical topics. The Earth's ecosystems are the natural foundation of human civilization. However, ecosystems have been profoundly degraded over the last 50 years and pressure on them continues unabated.
In a recently released report, Keeping Track of Our Changing Environment, UNEP has shown through peer-reviewed indicators how natural resources, from species extinction to biodiversity loss are being depleted or degraded at rates that are breaking historic records. But concrete evidence also shows that ecosystem management and a Green Economy can halt and reverse this trend. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), a broad partnership involving UNEP, is a major international initiative to draw attention to the global economic benefits of biodiversity as well as to highlight the multi-trillion dollar costs of biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation.
The Forum will produce a communiqué on ecosystem management which will be taken as a recommendation for the upcoming summit on sustainable development, popularly known as Rio+20, in Brazil next June.
The meeting will also mark the launch of the International Ecosystem Management Partnership (IEMP), a joint initiative of UNEP and CAS. IEMP will be a China-based international programme promoting ecosystem management in all developing countries, particularly in Africa.
Media, including photo/video, attending the forum must register in advance. Lunch will be included.
When: 09:00-18:30, 18 November 2011 (Friday)
Where: Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.11A Datun Road, Chaoyang district, Beijing
Who:
  • Mr. Zukang Sha, Under Secretary General, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs,
  • Mr. Achim Steiner, UN Under Secretary General, Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP),
  • Mme. Julia Marton-Lefevre, Director General of the World Conservation Union (IUCN),
  • Mr. Bjorn Roland Stigson, President, The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD),
  • Sir Crispin Tickell (Director, Policy Foresight Programme, James Martin Institute for Science and Civilization, Oxford University),
  • Mr. Art Hanson, International Chief Advisor, China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development (CCICED),
  • Officials from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, National Science Foundation of China will also attend and speak at the Forum.
For More Information and to Register, Please Contact:
Jiang Nanqing, UNEP China Office, Tel. +861085320922, Fax: +861085320907
Email: nanqing.jiang@public.un.org.cn
Guoqin Wang, International Ecosystem Management Partnership-UNEP,
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (IGSNRR),
Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 11A Datun Road. Beijing 100101
Tel/Fax: +86 10 64889031, Email: guoqin.wang@unep-iemp.org