Showing posts with label economic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economic. Show all posts

Saturday, January 14, 2012

OECD composite leading indicators continue pointing to slowdown in economic activity in most major economies

News Release. Paris, 12 January 2012. OECD. Composite leading indicators (CLIs), designed to anticipate turning points in economic activity relative to trend, continue pointing to a slowdown in activity in most OECD countries and major non-member economies.

The assessment is little changed compared to last month for most countries, but the CLIs for Japan, United States and Russia are showing stronger signs of a positive change in momentum and remain above long-term trend. The CLI for China has deteriorated since last month and is pointing to a slowdown in economic activity towards long-term trend. For other major economies and the Euro area, the CLIs continue pointing to slowdowns.

The above graphs show country specific composite leading indicators (CLIs). Turning points of CLIs tend to precede turning points in economic activity relative to long-term trend by approximately six months. The horizontal line at 100 represents the long-term trend of economic activity. Shaded triangles mark confirmed turning-points of the CLI. Blank triangles mark provisional turning-points that may be reversed.
Methodological Notes:

The CLI methodological notes are available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/22/47/44728410.pdf 

Access data:



CLI data for 33 OECD member countries and 6 OECD non-member economies are available at: http://stats.oecd.org/wbos/default.aspx?datasetcode=MEI_CLI

x

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Kenya Economic and Financial Policies IMF


Despite the severe drought in the arid and semi-arid parts of the country, high food and oil prices, and rapidly deteriorating global conditions, our economy has shown resilience with continued strong growth. We project real GDP growth to remain around 5 percent in FY 2011/12, supported by robust public and private investment. We therefore remain positive on the growth outlook, but we believe that the downside risks have risen, and need to be addressed to preserve and sustain the ongoing expansion in economic activity. Coping with the impact of persistently high international prices, the drought in the Horn of Africa, and the security threats coming from the Somali border, poses formidable challenges to macroeconomic policies.

All quantitative performance criteria and indicative targets for June 2011 have been met. In particular, we have managed to improve our fiscal position, despite the necessary measures taken to protect the vulnerable from high food and fuel prices, and the expenses associated with the implementation of the new constitution. Structural reforms have also moved forward and we are set to meet the benchmark on the submission of the VAT law for the second program review. 

However, since June the increased global market turbulence together with rising inflationary expectations has placed growing pressures on the shilling and on the demand for government securities. As a result, we have not been able to accumulate international reserves as programmed and the government has fully utilized its overdraft facility with the CBK. Therefore, the CBK’s net international reserves (NIRs) have fallen below the September indicative floor, and the CBK’s net domestic assets (NDAs) have risen above the September indicative ceiling.

Since the program first review, the country’s macroeconomic outlook has worsened with respect to inflation and the external position:

Inflation has intensified and reached levels that could threaten the economic expansion. First-round effects from the increased food and fuel prices have fed into core inflation because of strong domestic demand fueled by the rapid growth in credit to the private sector.

The country’s external position has deteriorated not only because of higher than originally expected international prices and drought-related import needs but also because of the strength of domestic demand.

The shilling’s exchange rate has depreciated substantially in response to a widening current account deficit. The shilling’s slide has added immediate pressures on domestic prices that, if not addressed, could feed back on the external position and the exchange rate raising the risk of destabilizing macroeconomic conditions. To address this risk and protect the ongoing economic expansion we intend to promptly adjust our macroeconomic policy stance by:

Further tightening monetary policy as needed to stem inflationary expectations; and Cutting back on non-priority government spending to contribute to lower domestic demand and mitigate the impact of monetary tightening on market interest rates.

We remain committed to a policy regime free from controls on prices, interest rates, and the exchange rate. We are convinced that price controls do not work, may be detrimental to economic activity, reduce access to essential goods, and hurt the poor most.


For more information about Projects in Kenya see Eastern Africa Projects


x

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Uruguay 2011 Selected Issues IMF


Potential output and the output gap are unobservable economic variables, yet they are critical for macroeconomic policymaking. In the case of fiscal policy, adequate estimates over the magnitude of the output gap help assess the structural fiscal policy stance, and make timely decisions to apply neutral or contra-cyclical policies as needed to ensure sustainable growth and help limit inflation pressures. In the case of monetary policy under inflation targeting regime frameworks, output gaps often feed the central bank’s implicit Taylor rules—helping determine the size of the needed adjustment to the monetary policy rate to keep inflation and inflation expectations on track. 

This paper provides estimates of both potential output and the output gap for Uruguay based on a wide range of methods. The objective of the paper is to provide the authorities with an extensive set of estimates that can help them guide policy implementation, as well as a sense of how robust these are. The paper also presents estimates of the impact of the agricultural activity—a leading sector—on the rest of the economy. 

The main findings of this study are as follows. First, there is a high degree of consistency among the different techniques applied in terms of the size and direction of the output gap. Second, the results based on univariate filters show some sensitivity to the length of the cycle assumed. Third, following the 2002/03 domestic financial crisis, Uruguay’s economy has undergone a substantial transformation, growth has accelerated, and it seems Uruguay is at a higher level of potential output. Four, despite the caveats discussed in the paper about the estimates, the consistency of the results across the different methods could contribute to guide the policy decision making process. Fifth, it seems that the spillovers from the agriculture sector to the rest of the economy are relatively moderate in most cases. 

The rest of this paper is organized as follows: Section B discusses estimates of potential output and the output gap for Uruguay applying univariate filters. Section C introduces additional economic information and theory to estimate potential output, shedding some light into the discussion of current monetary and fiscal policies. The objective is to take advantage of economic data to disentangle the most recent economic performance by introducing multivariate techniques such as the Kalman filter, the production function, and a Structural Vector Auto-regressive Model. Section D analyses the spillover effects from agriculture to the rest of the economy. Section E concludes with some relevant inputs for policy analysis and decision making. 

International Monetary Fund. Published: December 29, 2011


See


For more information about Projects in Uruguay see SOUTHERN CONE Projects

x

Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin America and the Caribbean 2011


ECLAC projects growth of 4.3% for the Latin American and Caribbean economy in 2011, lower than the rate in 2010 when the region was rebounding from the impacts of the economic and financial crisis of 2008-2009. The forecast growth rate for 2011, which represents a 3.2% rise in per capita GDP, reflects two main factors: the slacking of global economic growth and the cooling of domestic demand in Brazil, the region’s largest economy, prompted by the government’s measures to keep the economy from overheating after its growth surge in 2010.

During the first part of the year, however, external conditions remained benign for the region, with strong demand for its exports, improvements in the terms of trade and advantageous access to external financing. Several countries posted a more robust performance than in 2010, including oil exporters which gained from high international prices and several Central American and Caribbean countries which benefited from increased exports to the United States and remittances from emigrant workers. GDP growth was 4.6% in South America slightly above the 4.1% rate for Central America, while expansion of only 0.7% for the Caribbean is due to a contraction in Trinidad and Tobago, the subregion’s largest economy.

In the first half of the year, macroeconomic policy faced a number of challenges stemming partly from developments in international markets. The countries tackled these in different ways, depending on their structural characteristics, the severity of the respective impacts, the instruments available to them and their policy priorities. First of all, the positive outlook for the region’s economy and the interest rate spreads with respect to global financial markets —widened, in some cases, by the monetary policies deployed to contain the inflationary impact of rising international prices, especially for foods and fuels— spurred capital inflows which contributed to real currency appreciation in the region. In this context, a number of countries also withdrew the fiscal stimulus, seeking at the same time to regain the fiscal space consumed by the measures implemented to soften the impacts of the 2008-2009 crisis. Even so, the central government overall balance rose by 0.4 percentage points on average, mainly owing to higher fiscal revenues. As the year advanced, however, and the global and regional economic slowdown began to take hold, the focus of economic policy turned increasingly to maintaining an acceptable rate of growth, especially as the euro zone situation and outlook deteriorated.

At the regional level, growth in all demand components was down for the year overall, after the brisk recovery in 2010 from the lows during the global financial crisis. Household consumption continued to grow at rates above output, however, thanks to rising real wages and to strong job creation which brought the regional unemployment rate down from 7.3% in 2010 to 6.8% in 2011. Credit also continued to expand rapidly. Readily available credit at rates of interests which in many countries actually fell in real terms also contributed to a fresh rise in gross fixed capital formation, which took the investment ratio to a new record for recent decades, although it is still not high enough to sustain the growth rates required to satisfy the many economic and social needs of the region. Imports surged in response to buoyant domestic demand, while exports climbed mainly because of higher prices, while volumes increased less. In this context, the deficit on the balance-of-payments current account widened slightly to 1.4% of GDP, and was more than offset by voluminous inflows of foreign direct investment and, to a lesser extent, portfolio investment, which enabled fresh rises in international monetary reserves.

Driven mainly by high international prices for foods and fuels, the inflation rate rose in the first part of 2011, but began to ease later and ended the year at a rate of around 7%, only slightly higher than end-2010.

The slowdown in regional growth steepened in the second half of the year, reflecting slackening export growth, falling prices for the region’s main export commodities —which nonetheless remained at historically high levels— and cooling domestic demand. Particularly in the fourth quarter, regional growth expectations took a more negative turn as uncertainty mounted over the future of the global economy, especially in view of doubts over whether a sustainable solution will be found to the debt crisis in several euro zone countries, and the resulting volatility in international markets.

This is the scenario underlying 2012 economic growth projections for Latin America and the Caribbean. With global economic growth remaining sluggish, the regional slowdown is likely to continue, with a fresh, albeit moderate fall in the growth rate to 3.7%. A bleaker scenario cannot be ruled out, however, if the euro zone crisis deepens. This would take a toll on global markets and would certainly hurt the region’s growth prospects by impacting on both the real economy and the financial markets. Amid such great uncertainty and facing the possibility of sharp changes in the external environment, the Latin American and Caribbean countries should prepare the best possible measures in light of their national situations to protect and strengthen the bases of their economic and social development. Standing them in good stead are voluminous international monetary reserves and —with the exception of some Caribbean countries— low levels of public and external debt. On the other hand, less leeway is now available for some of the countercyclical instruments deployed during the 2008-2009 crisis and some of the external factors which contributed to the rapid recovery of the global economy at that time, especially the developed countries’ fiscal and monetary coordination, are now weaker.

CEPAL. División de Desarrollo EconómicoNaciones Unidas, 2000-2011 Diciembre 2011 124 pp



Briefing Paper
Presentation of the Launch of the Preliminary Overview
Contents and Summary
Introduction
Macroeconomic Policy
Domestic Performance
External Sector
Statistical Annex
Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Chile
Colombia
Eastern Caribbean Currency Union
Guyana
Jamaica
Mexico
Peru
Suriname
Trinidad and Tobago

x