Showing posts with label poverty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label poverty. Show all posts

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Nepal.Second Poverty Alleviation Fund Project

Procurement Plan (PP) for Non-Consulting Services From July 16, 2011 to July 15, 2012.Poject Name & ID: Poverty Alleviation Fund Project-II Grant No: H3370-NEP.Executing Agency : Poverty Alleviation Fund, Gyaneshwor, kathmandu.Implementing Agency:Poverty Alleviation Fund, Gyaneshwor, Kathmandu.

Document Date: 2011/11/22. Document Type: Procurement Plan.Report Number:65818.Volume No: 1 of 1
World Bank. Nepal - Second Poverty Alleviation Fund Project : procurement plana

East Asia.Strengthening Evaluation of Poverty Reduction Innovations : Regional

The TA will improve DMC ability to measure, evaluate, and replicate access to finance and other related poverty reduction efforts by increasing understanding and application of randomized control trials and other modern evaluation techniques. The TA will achieve this result in three ways. First, it will introduce new evaluation techniques to DMC officials and academics in a short, practical training course, with information on how to apply the results to improve policy and practice.

Second, the TA will run a three day international conference, where practitioners and researchers from around the globe will present the latest evaluation results of projects in financial access and poverty reduction to policymakers. Gender impact will be an essential aspect of the presentations. Finally, an evaluation implementation grants program to be awarded at the end of the conference will facilitate evaluation benefits and capacity building for DMCs.  

Asian Development Bank.Project Number.45292-01

East Asia.Strengthening Evaluation of Poverty Reduction Innovations : Regional a

Friday, December 2, 2011

World Bank to Finance Private Sector Growth Policies in Rwanda

Press Release No:2012/179/AFR. WASHINGTON, November 29, 2011—The World Bank Board of Executive Directors approved financing to the Government of Rwanda in the amount of US$125 million. The Eighth Poverty Reduction Support Financing (PRSF-8) will help the Government’s implementation priorities in its medium term strategy, the Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy (EDPRS). Given Rwanda’s status as a blend country, US$60 million of the funds are on IDA grant terms and US$65 million are on IDA credit terms.

The PRSF-8 is the first operation in the third series of World Bank Poverty Reduction Support operations for Rwanda launched in 2002. The new series particularly supports the development of policies that facilitate increased private sector investment and involvement and ease constraints to broad based growth.
“This main focus, on creating opportunity for growth and harnessing private sector growth for sustainable poverty reduction, reflects the key thrust of the new World Bank Strategy for Africa.” said Mimi Ladipo, World Bank Country Manager for Rwanda.

During the PRSF8-10 priority areas of support will be policy measures aimed at: (i) supporting the facilitation of trade and investments; (ii) increasing access to electricity and improved infrastructure services; (iii) raising private sector participation in the agricultural sector; (iv) increasing the quality and relevance of education to build a skilled workforce; (v) improving service delivery through focused and strategic civil service reform; and (vi) strengthening the management of public resources, including increasing transparency and accountability.

The PRSF-8 financing is dependent on progress against EDPRS objectives as measured by the Common Performance Assessment Framework relied upon by all budget support partners in Rwanda. The most recent XIV Joint Budget Support Review, held on October 24-25, 2011, showed that Rwanda is making good progress in terms of implementing the targets and policy actions within the harmonized framework of budget support. “The proposed US$125 million in IDA commitments for this operation is the largest single development policy financing tranche to Rwanda so far. It reflects the World Bank’s positive assessment of the Rwandan Government’s continued commitment to reforms that can lead to inclusive and broad based development.” said Birgit Hansl World Bank Task Team Leader.

The Rwanda IDA portfolio comprises eight investment projects with a net commitment of US$277 million.

Contact:
In Kigali: Rogers Kayihura, +250-591-303, rkayihura@worldbank.org.s

Friday, November 25, 2011

Peru:Social Sectors Reform Program III

The purpose of the operation is to support the Peruvian government in improving the policy instruments used in its strategy to combat poverty

PE-L1105:Social Sectors Reform Program IIIa

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Brazil.Rural Poverty Reduction Project-Minas Gerais

Ratings for the Rural Poverty Reduction Project - Minas Gerais for Brazil were as follows: outcomes were satisfactory, risk to development outcome was low, Bank performance was satisfactory, and borrower performance was also satisfactory.

Some lessons learned included: the Project's demand-drivenness improves local governance by giving poor rural communities a unique set of experiences involving collective action, priority-setting, decision-making, and investment financial management, operation and maintenance. Social capital under this and similar projects is both a benefit in its own right and an element in the success of participatory rural poverty reduction.

By working with existing CMDRSs (Conselho Municipal de Desenvolvimento Rural Sustentavel - Sustainable Rural Development Municipal Council) in the project area and successfully increasing their representation among potential project beneficiaries, both the quality and targeting of public resources (project and non-project) improved, while leveraging complementary funding and deepening the investment stock needed for faster rural poverty reduction.

Experience in Minas Gerais and elsewhere shows unequivocally that demand-driven mechanisms not only enable women to access the benefits of community investments, but provide opportunities for women through the community associations.

The project demonstrated, albeit on a small scale, that participatory, demand-driven mechanisms are cultural practices of these groups and that they can manage the subproject participatory mechanisms, effectively.

World Bank.Document Date:2011/01/20. Document Type:  Implementation Completion and Results Report. Report Number:  ICR1657. Volume No:  1 of 1

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication

Unep.org/NewsCentreBeijing, 16 November 2011-A new UN report demonstrates that governments and businesses alike are taking steps to accelerate a global shift towards a low-carbon, resource-efficient and socially inclusive green future. From China to Barbados, Brazil to South Africa, countries are developing Green Economy strategies and activities to spur greater economic growth and jobs, environmental protection and equality.
In a statement issued on the release of UNEP's flagship report, Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said: "With the world looking ahead to the Rio+20 UN Conference on Sustainable Development in June 2012, the UNEP Green Economy report challenges the myth that there is a trade-off between the economy and the environment. With smart public policies, governments can grow their economies, generate decent employment and accelerate social progress in a way that keeps humanity's ecological footprint within the planet's carrying capacity."
Key Messages
The report, a result of a three-year global research effort involving hundreds of experts, underwent a three-month public review before being unveiled today. It confirms that an investment of two percent of global GDP across 10 key sectors is what is required to kick-start a shift from the current brown, polluting and inefficient economy to a green one.

The report estimates that such a transition would grow the global economy at around the same rate, if not higher, than those forecast, under current economic models.

But without rising risks, shocks, scarcities and crises increasingly inherent in the existing, resource-depleting, high carbon 'brown' economy, says the study.
In addition to higher growth, an overall transition to a Green Economy would realize per capita incomes higher than under current economic models, while reducing the ecological footprint by nearly 50 per cent in 2050, as compared to business-as-usual.
The Green Economy Report acknowledges that in the short-term, job losses in some sectors - fisheries for example - are inevitable if they are to transition towards sustainability.
However, it adds that over time the number of "new and decent jobs created" in sectors - ranging from renewable energies to more sustainable agriculture - will, however, offset those lost from the former "brown economy".
As a result, a growing number of countries are undertaking activities to accelerate this transition.
At the China Council meeting this week, for example, the government's international advisory group is expected to put forward its own study for moving towards a Green Economy.
China is the world's lead investor in renewable energy, overtaking Spain in 2009 and spending US$49 billion in 2010. Overall, China is committed to spending US$468 billion over the next five years, more than double the previous five years, on key industries, including renewable energy, clean technologies and waste management.
"China considers the Green Economy to be a strategic choice in an increasingly resource constrained world, and we have made that choice in our development plans," said Mr. He Bingguang, Director General of the Department of Resource Conservation and Environmental Protection in China's National Development and Reform Commission.
"We appreciate UNEP's contribution in promoting a global Green Economy transformation, which holds the potential for all countries to benefit," he added.
Some countries, such as Barbados, Cambodia, Indonesia, the Republic of Korea and South Africa, already have national Green Economy plans that reflect the report's recommendations.
Others such as Armenia, Azerbaijan, Egypt, Kenya, Jordan, Malaysia, Mexico, Nepal, Senegal and Ukraine are focusing on greening priority sectors, such as agriculture, renewable energy, tourism and clean technologies.
Today in Rwanda, East African countries are meeting to explore how laws and regulatory frameworks can help drive a Green Economy at the national and regional level. Participants from Burundi, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, as well as Rwanda, will examine case studies and continent-wide initiatives, the latter being led by the African Union.
On the business side, UNEP has teamed up with 285 of the world's leading investors, representing US$20 trillion in assets, who called on governments to mobilize action on climate change, including investments in emerging industries - like renewables and green buildings. Similar calls have been echoed by the International Chamber of Commerce, which represents hundreds of thousands of businesses in more than 130 countries.
"The elements of a transition to a Green Economy are clearly emerging across developing and developed countries alike. There are now some nations going further and faster than others which is in many ways generating a 'pull factor' that, if maintained, may bring others along over the coming months and years," said Achim Steiner, UN Under Secretary General and Executive Director of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP).
The recent drive in clean investment is not only benefitting emerging economies, but also other developing countries. According to the latest Bloomberg figures, global investments in renewable energy jumped 32 per cent in 2010, to a record US$211 billion. After the emerging economies of Brazil, China and India, countries in Africa posted the highest percentage increase of all developing regions.
In Egypt, renewable energy investment rose by US$800 million to US$1.3 billion as a result of the solar thermal project in Kom Ombo and a 220 megawatt onshore wind farm in the Gulf of Zayt. In Kenya, investment climbed from virtually zero in 2009 to US$1.3 billion in 2010 across technologies such as wind, geothermal, small-scale hydro and biofuels.
In the California Mojave Desert, one of the world's largest solar-thermal power plants is under construction and others are also being built in Spain and other parts of the United States.
"The Durban climate convention meeting in a few week's time and Rio+20 next year are key opportunities to accelerate and scale-up the Green Economy. Central cooperative actions range from advancing Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+), moving on green procurement to switch national efforts into the sustainability space up to a new indicator of wealth that goes beyond GDP and internalizes the costs of pollution and degradation while bringing the true value of the planet's nature-based assets into calculations of a successful and sustainable economic path," said Mr. Steiner.
A series of UN-backed regional consultations on the Green Economy have underscored the growing interest in the report. While issues of financing and trade need to be addressed further, there is an acknowledgement that the current economic model, based solely on GDP growth, has resulted in the gross misallocation of capital and inequitable distribution of wealth.
The Report shows that investing the equivalent of two per cent of global GDP into agriculture, energy, buildings, water, forestry, fisheries, manufacturing, waste, tourism and transport would not only shift the global economy onto a more sustainable growth trajectory, but it would actually maintain or increase growth over time compared to the current business-as-usual scenario.
Policy recommendations on each of the 10 key sectors, as well as on finance and enabling conditions, are outlined in the report.
On transport, for example, the report suggests that prices need to take account of the societal costs accumulated as a result of congestion, accidents and pollution, which in some cases amount to over 10 per cent of the national or regional GDP. In Beijing, a 2009 study estimated that the social costs induced by motorized transportation are equivalent to between 7.5 and 15 per cent of the city's GDP.
Globally, the transport sector's impact on natural resources is wide-ranging, from the manufacturing of vehicles, which uses metals and plastics, to its use of fossil fuels, which involves engine oil, rubber and other consumable materials. Between 2007 and 2030, the transport sector is expected to account for 97 per cent of the increase in the world's primary oil use.
With the number of vehicles in China expected to more than triple during this period, the government is promoting low-carbon, energy efficient cars and related infrastructure. In the city of Shenzhen, home of China's first electric car, plans are underway to build large recharging stations and replace traditional buses with more than 7,000 electric ones in five years time.
Generating Jobs
The Green Economy Report suggests that over time "new and decent jobs" will be catalyzed in these key sectors. A recent study by ILO and the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), entitled, Low Carbon Development and Green Employment in China, confirms that this is the case.
It provides a list of likely winners and losers and the scale of direct and indirect impact involved to identify net gains. It concludes that while 800,000 workers in small coal power plants in China are likely to lose their jobs due to climate mitigation actions, some 2.5 million jobs could be created by 2020 in the wind energy sector alone.
Currently, Denmark is home to the world's top wind turbine manufacturer in terms of market volume, and China is in second place, followed by the United States and then another Chinese company. Germany ranks fifth. However, Germany has recently committed to scale up its renewable energy, following a decision to phase out nuclear power by 2022, and has thus set a target to source 35 per cent of its electricity from renewable energies by 2022, instead of the earlier target of 19 per cent.
In Africa, despite recent economic gains, there is increasing interest in creating green and decent employment. Representatives from 11 African countries met in June this year with ILO, UNDP and UNEP to look at case studies in the areas of recycling, sustainable construction and natural resource management. As a result, participants adopted action plans for creating green jobs in fisheries, agriculture and forestry, sectors which represent over 70 per cent of the employment in the region.
In Brazil, the ILO recently helped support the construction of 500,000 new homes with solar heating systems, resulting in 30,000 new jobs. In South Africa, a similar project on water ecosystem restoration created 25,000 green jobs for previously unemployed people, and at the same time, restored vital freshwater sources.
Generating Social Equity
Approximately two billion people live on smallholder farms, and despite making a significant contribution to food security, the majority of these farmers are malnourished and live in poverty. Low prices, unfair trade practice and a lack of transport contribute to their dilemma. The Green Economy Report argues that by moving to more sustainable agriculture practices, these farmers could increase their yields and profits.
Globally, an investment of US$100-300 billion per year in green agriculture, between now and 2050, could lead to better soil quality and better yields for major crops, representing a 10 per cent increase over the current business-as-usual strategies. As many of these farmers are also women, any benefits would most likely be shared with their families and communities.
The waste sector is another area that is expected to enhance social equity. Efforts to green the sector are often driven by cost savings, environmental awareness and resource scarcity.
However, the report notes that greening the sector not only requires improving the often sub-standard waste treatment and disposal facilities, it also entails training the workers, providing more equitable compensation and ensuring proper health care protection for them. Decentralizing large scale, capital-intensive waste management operations could also provide more employment opportunities in the community.
Electronic waste (or e-waste) is also a concern, particularly for developing countries. Current estimates suggest 20 to 50 million tonnes of e-waste are generated each year, while trade in waste becomes more prevalent, heightening threats to human health and the environment.
As sales in mobile phones and computers continue to grow in China, India, and across Africa and Latin America, the report finds that resource recovery and recycling offer the greatest potential in terms of contributing to a Green Economy.
Notes to the Editors:
Rio Earth Summit: In 1992 the UN Conference on Sustainable Development, popularly known as the Rio Earth Summit, was convened in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to address the state of the environment and sustainable development. In June 2012, there will be the follow up meeting or Rio+20 in Brazil, where one of the main themes governments are expected to address is Green Economy "in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication".

For more information, please contact:
Nick Nuttall, UNEP Division of Communication and Public Information Acting Director and Spokesman, Tel. +41 795 965 737 or +254 733 632 755 or email nick.nuttall@unep.org
Ms. Jiang Nanqing, UNEP China Office, Tel. +86-10-85320922, Mobile: +86-13501051650, Email: nanqing.jiang@unep.org
Ms. Chen Hao, UNEP China Office, Tel: +86-10-85320921, Mobile: +86-15810425490, Email: hao.bath@gmail.com

Monday, November 14, 2011

Nicaragua: Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper - Progress Report on National Human Development Plan as of 2010

The operational goal of Nicaragua’s National Human Development Plan (NHDP) is economic growth with increased employment and reduced inequality and poverty. The results for 2007-2010 highlight a significant reduction in inequality among Nicaraguans based on better distribution of income and consumption as reflected in improved living conditions for the population, particularly among the poorest groups. This has been possible due to, among other factors, redistributive government policies with positive results, to economic recovery and positive economic growth in the midst of a world financial and economic crisis, and to a climate of confidence that has led to greater levels of social cohesion and national alliances lending stability to productive development
and increasing investment, which have led to a reduction in poverty.

Nicaragua ranks second in Latin America in terms of the reduction in inequality (Venezuela is the leader), achieving a minus 9.8 percent upon reducing the income GINI coefficient from 0.51 in 2005 to 0.46 in 2009. This improvement is significant considering that between 2005 and 2009 Nicaragua grew at an average annual rate of 1.69 percent, less than the 2.77 percent growth rate for Latin America as a whole and considering that this improvement occurs in a period of profound global economic, social, and environmental crisis.

As a result, in 2009 compared to 2005, Nicaragua has achieved reduction of 5.8 percentage points in general poverty and 2.6 percentage points in extreme poverty, according to the National Household Living Standards Survey (EMNV). The survey shows that general poverty at the national level measured on the basis of consumption fell from 48.3 percent to 42.5 percent between 2005 and 2009, and extreme poverty fell from 17.2 percent to 14.6 percent during the same period. In relative terms, the great challenge continues to be reducing poverty in rural areas. Extreme poverty in the rural area is approximately five times higher than the urban area and general poverty in the rural area is twice that of the urban area. However, while general poverty in rural areas fell by 7.0 percentage points, urban general poverty fell by 4.1 points. While extreme rural poverty fell by 3.9 percentage points, extreme urban poverty fell by 1.1 points. Thus, the greatest reduction is being achieved in rural areas where the most profound and severe poverty exists.

The reduction in poverty measured on the basis of income (according to the International Poverty Line) is also significant. In 2009, 5.5 percent of the Nicaraguan population consumed US$1.25 or less per day (less than half the 11.2 percent in 2005); a reduction of 5.7 percentage points. Twentyone percent survived on consumption of US$2.00 or less, a reduction of 10.6 percentage points compared to 31.6 percent in 2005. The results by area of residence show that the reduction in the percentage of people surviving on less than US$1.25 per day was 2.3 and 9.8 percentage points for urban and rural areas, respectively, while for those living on US$2.00 per day the reduction was 6.1 and 15.7 percentage points, respectively. Again, the reduction is more significant in rural areas, indicating that targeted social programs are yielding positive results.

Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) are prepared by member countries in broad consultation with stakeholders and development partners, including the staffs of the World Bank and the IMF.Updated every three years with annual progress reports, they describe the country’s macroeconomic, structural, and social policies in support of growth and poverty reduction, as well as associated external financing needs and major sources of financing. This country document for Nicaragua, dated September 2011, is being made available on the IMF website by agreement with the member country as a service to users of the IMF website. The views expressed in this document are those of the staff team and do not necessarily reflect the views of the government of Nicaragua or the Executive Board of the IMF. © 2011 International Monetary Fund November 2011. IMF Country Report No. 11/323, IMF.November 14, 2011. Country Report No. 11/323. Nicaragua

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Should cash transfers be confined to the poor ? implications for poverty and inequality in Latin America

This paper compares for 13 Latin American countries the poverty and inequality impacts of cash transfer programs that are given to all children and the elderly (that is, "categorical" transfers), to programs of equal budget that are confined to the poor within each population group (that is, "poverty targeted" transfers).

The analysis finds that both the incidence of poverty and the depth of the poverty gap are important factors affecting the relative effectiveness of categorical versus poverty targeted transfers. The comparison of transfers to children and the elderly also supports the view that choosing carefully categories of beneficiaries is almost as important as targeting the poor for achieving a high poverty and inequality impact.

Overall, the findings suggest that although in the Latin American context poverty targeting tends to deliver higher poverty impacts, there are circumstances under which categorical targeting confined to geographical regions (sometimes called "geographic targeting") may be a valid option to consider. This is particularly the case in low-income countries with widespread pockets of poverty.

Argentina,Bolivia,Brazil,Chile,Colombia,Dominican Republic,Ecuador,El Salvador

Author:Acosta,Pablo;Leite,Phillipe;Rigolini,Jamele.Document. Date: 2011/11/01.Document Type:  Policy Research Working Paper.Report Number: WPS5875.Volume No: 1 of 1

35 pages
Official Version
[2.45 mb]

Text Version*