The global financial crisis has uncovered a number of weaknesses in the
supervision and regulation of cross border banks. One such weakness was the lack
of effective cooperation among banking supervisors.
Since then, international
bodies, such as the G-20, the Financial Stability Board and the Basel Committee
have actively promoted the use of supervisory colleges. The objective of this
paper is to explore the obstacles to effective cross border supervisory
information sharing. More specifically, a schematic presentation illustrating
the misalignments in incentives for information sharing between home and host
supervisors under the current supervisory task-sharing anchored in the Basel
Concordat is developed.
This paper finds that in the absence of an ex ante
agreed upon resolution and burden-sharing mechanism and deteriorating health of
the bank, incentive conflicts escalate and supervisory cooperation breaks down.
The promotion of good practices for cooperation in supervisory colleges is thus
not sufficient to address the existing incentive conflicts.
What is needed is a
rigorous analysis and review of the supervisory task-sharing framework, so that
the right incentives are secured during all stages of the supervisory process.
For this purpose, it is essential that policy makers integrate and harmonize the
current debates on crisis management, resolution policy and good supervisory
practices for cross border banking supervision
Author: D'Hulster,Katia;Document Date: 2011/11/01. Document Type: Policy Research Working Paper. Report Number: WPS5871.Volume No: 1 of 1
39 pages | Official Version | [2.73 mb] | |
Text | Text Version* |
No comments:
Post a Comment
prueba