Showing posts with label carbon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label carbon. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Pilot Carbon Emissions Trading System Readied in China

25 January 2012.The Asian Development Bank (ADB) will help the People’s Republic of China (PRC) set up a pilot provincial emissions trading system that could pave the way for a national scheme and lower greenhouse gas emissions in the country.

“Emissions trading encourages companies to increase energy efficiency and renewable energy supply, which would ultimately result in reduced greenhouse gas emissions.  This pilot will provide valuable lessons for the design of a nationwide system to reduce the carbon intensity of the Chinese economy,” said Pradeep Perera, Senior Energy Specialist in ADB’s East Asia Department.

ADB is providing a $750,000 equivalent grant to lcaray the groundwork for a cap-and-trade based emission trading system (ETS) in Tianjin municipal area which could begin operations as early as 2013. ADB will help design the platform, including the trading rules and regulatory framework, as well as support the commissioning of the trading platform.

Cap-and-trade based emission trading allows market participants to turn emission savings into a tradable commodity and provides market-based incentives for industries to reduce their use of carbon-emitting fossil fuels. It is economically more efficient than a carbon tax, as the carbon price is determined by the market and intended emission reductions are stipulated by the market regulator. Europe has a well-developed cap-and-trade based ETS, which will provide useful lessons for the design of the Tianjin ETS.

The PRC is the world’s largest emitter of carbon emissions, but it has been making major strides in recent years to improve energy efficiency and to increase the use of renewable power sources.

Under its current five-year national development plan to 2015, it has set significant carbon and energy intensity reduction targets and is looking at developing market platforms that can provide companies with economic incentives to cut emissions. The government has also earmarked similar pilot emission trading schemes for development in Beijing, Shanghai, Chongqing municipalities, and in Guangdong and Hubei provinces.

ADB’s assistance will include a $200,000 grant from its Technical Assistance Special Fund, as well as a $550,000 grant from the Climate Change Fund. The Fund, established by ADB in 2008, aims to stimulate investments in developing member countries which address the causes and consequences of climate change x

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Thailand Clean energy for green low-carbon growth

Thailand needs to avoid the high-carbon growth path of many developed countries and, instead, take a low-carbon growth path. A green low-carbon growth path is in Thailand's own interest as it can simultaneously tackle local environmental degradation, global climate change, and energy security challenges. It can also position Thailand as a regional leader in green, sustainable growth. Green low-carbon growth in Thailand could focus on the following four pillars: 1) maintaining rapid economic growth while adjusting the country's economic structure toward a less energy, and carbon-intensive economy; 2) achieving greater urbanization while shifting toward green livable low-carbon cities; 3) meeting the huge thirst for energy while transforming the energy sector toward one of high energy efficiency and widespread diffusion of low-carbon technologies; and 4) improving quality of life while shifting toward a resource-efficient and sustainable lifestyle.

Thailand needs to avoid the high-carbon growth path of many developed countries and, instead, take a low-carbon growth path. A green low-carbon growth path is in Thailand’s own interest as it can simultaneously tackle local environmental degradation, global climate change, and energy security challenges. It can also position Thailand as a regional leader in green, sustainable growth.

• Green low-carbon growth in Thailand could focus on the following four pillars:
1. Maintaining rapid economic growth while adjusting the country’s economic structure toward a less energy- and carbon-intensive economy
2. Achieving greater urbanization while shifting toward green livable low-carbon cities
3. Meeting the huge thirst for energy while transforming the energy sector toward one of high energy efficiency and widespread diffusion of low-carbon technologies
4. Improving quality of life while shifting toward a resource-efficient and sustainable lifestyle.

• Changes in the economic structure toward an innovation-driven, high-tech, and service-sector-based economy is a key driver to reduce energy and carbon intensity in Thailand. Despite the government’s efforts, Thailand’s economic structure has shifted over the last decade toward dominance of the energy-intensive industrial sectors-a main reason for the rising energy intensity.

• Building green livable low-carbon cities requires a holistic multisector approach to integrate compact urban form, green buildings and renewable energy supply, sustainable transport, and efficient water and waste management. Bangkok’s carbon dioxide emissions per capita are already high compared to the leading developed cities. Higher density and more mixed-use urban design can substantially reduce energy demand and emissions. Urban public transport is the key to improving green mobility. Green buildings require strengthening enforcement of building codes.

• To greatly improve energy efficiency and achieve the goals of the Energy
Efficiency Development Plan (EEDP), Thailand needs to increase the use of pricing and fiscal measures and performance-based energy-saving targets. The government has actively adopted policies and financing mechanisms to promote energy efficiency, but energy intensity has not changed much over the last decade. The government is committed to reducing energy intensity by 25 percent from 2005 to 2030, among which the transport and industrial sectors offer the largest energy savings. Containing energy growth in the transport sector requires mandatory fuel economy standards, fuel taxes and road pricing, and public transport infrastructure. Industrial-performance-based energy-saving targets can be more effective than the current input-based energy managers program. Finally, the Standard Offer approach can be an innovative and cost-effective way to scale-up the Energy Conservation Promotion Fund.

World Bank. Author:Wang, Xiaodong; Document Date:2011/09/01.Document Type:Working Paper.Report Number:66220


For more information about Projects in Thailand see South-Eastern Asia Projectsx

Monday, January 2, 2012

Carbon Rights in Brazil


Brazil does not have a national law that specifically addresses the legal nature and ownership of carbon credits or rights to greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions and/or removals. It is however expected that the implementation of the Brazilian Climate Change Policy, which promotes the development of an organized Brazilian carbon market overseen by the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission, will lead to an eventual  clarification of the precise nature and ownership of tradable carbon rights. 

Some legislation at state-level already refers to rights derived from measures that reduce or remove GHG emissions, but stops short of clearly stating how these rights to  emission reductions are to be treated outside the governmental programs they create. For instance the Amazonas State Climate Change Policy establishes the general legal framework for promoting carbon offset projects and payments for ecosystem services within land owned by the State, and assigns the rights to exploit environmental products and services (implicitly including carbon rights) to a publicprivate institution created for this purpose

In the absence of particular legal treatment, general provisions of constitutional and civil law are applied to define initial ownership of these credits or rights. The Brazilian Civil Code states that the ownership right shall include the right to use, dispose of , and legally defend the property  against unlawful possession. The Civil Code further states that the accessories or products derived from “a thing” belong to the owner of that thing unless stipulated otherwise by specific rule or contract (e.g., the rights to accessories and products may be transferred via usufruct, lease or the grant of surface rights). As a general rule this implies that the right to exploit GHG benefits associated with a certain activity rests with the owner (or rightful holder) of the physical asset or process that generates 

World Bank. Author: Chagas, Thiago. Document Date: 2010/10/01.Document Type: Working Paper.Report Number: 65866


For information about Projects in Brazil see Central Brazil Projects

See Ghana.Carbon Rights
x

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Ghana.Carbon rights

REDD+ offers monetary incentives that could complement Ghana’s efforts to conserve what remains of its forest estate and further expand forests. State managed forest reserves, covering an area of 1.6 million ha, have been depleted and, to a large extent, degraded: less than 2% of forest reserves are said to be in excellent condition, and no less than half have been described as ‘mostly degraded or in worse condition’ (Treue, 2001; Bamfo, 2010).Outside the reserves, what are known as the “off-reserve forests” occupy an area of4.5m ha and are made up of scattered trees on agricultural fields, secondary forests regenerating from agricultural farming, riparian forest strips along streams, sacred groves and some closed-canopy forests, making them unprofitable to manage (Kotey et al., 1998; Abebrese, 2002). In Ghana, degradation is presumed to contribute more to forest carbon stock reduction than deforestation (Hansen et al., 2009). As REDD has expanded to include other activities, such as the sustainable management of forests and the enhancement of forest carbon stocks (“REDD +”), Ghana has a real opportunity to benefit, given the potential for the enhancement of forest carbon stocks through afforestation and reforestation activities. To take advantage of this, Ghana has been participating in the World Bank’s Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF) that aims to assist developing countries in building capacity for REDD+. So far, Ghana’s Readiness Preparation Proposal (R-PP) has been approved.

It is currently in the process of demonstrating how it would comply with the World Bank’s social and environmental safeguards before the grant agreement, which funds the implementation of Ghana’s R-PP and national REDD+ strategy, is signed (Bamfo, 2010). In Ghana the main drivers of deforestation are agricultural expansion, illegal logging and fuel wood collection. Since the 1990s, a number of statutes, regulations and development plans originating in the Forest and Wildlife Policy 1994 (FWP), have been introduced in an attempt to reverse the effects of decades of unsustainable forest management policies and practices. The primary objective of most of these reforms is to safeguard the State’s timber resources. Some of the other objectives, like the enhancement
of [degraded] forest estates, conservation of biodiversity and rural community participation, are compatible with those of REDD+. If Ghana is to benefit from REDD+, key stakeholders, for example the farmers and forest dependent communities who contribute to a significant proportion of the deforestation rate, must be suitably incentivized, for example through ensuring their share in the benefits generated by REDD+. Although rural community participation has been sought, the necessary changes to tree tenure that would incentivize these stakeholders have not been made yet.

World Bank.Author: Osafo,Y.B.Document Date:2010/10/01.Document Type: Working Paper.Report Number: 65868.Volume No:1 of 1

x

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Carbon Finance Support to Poorest Countries New World Bank Carbon Initiatives Announced in Durban

Press Release No:2012/188/SDN. Durban, South Africa, December 6, 2011. The World Bank announced two new financial initiatives – the Carbon Initiative for Development (Ci-Dev) and the third tranche of the BioCarbon Fund (BioCF T3) – to help the least-developed countries access financing for low-carbon investments and enable them to tap into carbon markets after 2012.

“The World Bank is helping countries in the further development of carbon markets and other market mechanisms to support acceleration of mitigation efforts, and access to those markets for less developed countries,” said Rachel Kyte, World Bank Vice President for Sustainable Development. “The Bank wants to ensure that its suite of financial instruments, including private sources of capital via carbon markets, is accessible to all country clients so they can invest in their sustainable development.  The initiatives launched today, focused on agriculture and access to energy, will strengthen links to these markets for the world’s poorest communities to these markets, as well as the flow of financing to action on the ground.”

The new carbon finance instruments will enable client countries to purchase certified emission reductions (commonly called ‘carbon credits’) from a diverse range of projects such as household biogas systems in Nepal, cook stoves in Africa, reforestation in the Democratic Republic of Congo, soil carbon in Kenya, and  municipal solid waste in Uganda.  These ongoing projects are helping to facilitate and accelerate access to energy in some of the world’s poorest countries.

The Ci-Dev, aiming to raise USD 120 million, is a partnership of donor and recipient countries where public and private sector entities are pledging their support to capacity building and carbon market development in the poorest countries of the world.  The Walloon Region (Belgium) is seeking to pledge 5 million Euros with an immediate 1.2 million Euros by the end of 2011.  A number of public and private sector entities, including the Norwegian company Statoil, have expressed interest in the Ci-Dev as buyers of the ensuing carbon credits.

“We are pleased to support these new initiatives which will help the poorest countries gain greater access to global carbon markets.  We anticipate that the Ci-Dev, through successful demonstration and piloting, will have a multiplier effect to bring even greater resources to help these countries grow sustainably,” said Walloon Minister of Environment Philippe Henry.

The second initiative, the BioCF T3, will focus on reforestation and agriculture projects that go hand in hand with co-benefits such as decreased soil erosion and increased land fertility.  The expansion of the BioCF will build on seven years of work in these areas.  Notably, eight out of nine forestry projects registered in Africa to date have been developed by this World Bank initiative.  By focusing on forestry and agriculture, the projects will develop new opportunities in crucial sectors because the farm economy predominates and is the single-largest source of income, jobs, and livelihoods in the poorest countries including in Africa.

“For Ethiopia, sustainable land management, reforestation of degraded lands, improving agriculture yields and access to energy are critical development priorities.  The carbon markets have provided capital to help Ethiopia start achieving this. But it’s not enough - we are eager to do many more projects, scale up those we have started and test new approaches to expand the financial resources available to our country, and the expanded BioCarbon Fund will help us do this,” says Dr. Wondwossen Sintayehu, Director, Environmental Law and Policy Division, Environmental  Protection Authority, Ethiopia.

Despite current concerns in the carbon market stemming from uncertainty over the future of the Kyoto Protocol, the decision by the World Bank to launch post-2012 carbon initiatives is indicative of the institution’s commitment to support market-based instruments to fight climate change.

The World Bank is trustee of 12 carbon funds and facilities capitalized at $2.7 billion. These funds and facilities support some 174 active projects that are expected to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases by the equivalent of an estimated 220 million metric tons of carbon dioxide. Twenty percent of the World Bank’s portfolio of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) projects is in sub-Saharan Africa, substantially higher than the 2% percent average generally for CDM projects.n

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Costa Rica under the World Bank's Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (REDD+)

Costa Rica is currently developing its national REDD+ strategy. It has developed a Readiness Preparation Proposal (R-PP) under the World Bank’s Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF). This fits within a broader low carbon development strategy which has an objective for carbon neutrality by 2021. The emerging REDD+ strategy is closely tied into the existing payments for environmental services (PES) system. PES has been an effective REDD+ instrument because it has helped in reordering land uses at the landscape level.

Forest cover has increased from 42% to 52% between 1997 and 2008, and PES has contributed to reducing deforestation in the areas where funds have been concentrated. It should be noted that it is difficult to determine exactly how much of this can be attributed to the PES scheme or to other socioeconomic factors. Factors such as low agriculture and cattle prices, a blooming tourism industry, a growing services and real estate industry, higher levels of education and environmental conscience, and other structural factors such as clear land rights, have helped PES to have such positive impacts.

Early efforts such as the PES policy have already contributed towards the goal of carbon neutrality and have resulted in historic emissions from the sector over the last ten years that are negative. This means that Costa Rica could find it difficult to benefit from a REDD+ system that rewards reductions in deforestation and degradation rates, if rewards do not take into account such early actions. However, in order to reach a goal of carbon neutrality by 2021 in the face of rising emissions in other sectors, it is also likely to be necessary to expand the PES system. In such an expanded scenario the forest sector could contribute around 65% to the carbon neutrality effort.

The Costa Rican PES system offers interesting insights into the structuring of financial incentive mechanisms for forest protection and how equity issues are taken into consideration.

World Bank.Author:  Navarro, Guillermo.Document Date:  2010/10/01. Document Type:  Working Paper.Report Number:65867.Volume No:  1 of 1

x

Saturday, November 26, 2011

Near-term Climate Protection and Clean Air Benefits:Actions for Controlling Short-Lived Climate Forcers

London/Nairobi, 25 November 2011. A package of 16 measures could, if fully implemented across the globe, save close to 2.5 million lives a year; avoid crop losses amounting to 32 million tonnes annually and deliver near-term climate protection of about half a degree C by 2040.
The report estimates that implementing these measures would help keep a global temperature rise below the 2 degrees C target, at least until mid-century.
The measures, outlined in a new report compiled by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) with an international team of experts, target short-lived climate forcers (SLCFs)—black carbon which is a major component of soot, methane and tropospheric ozone.

The report emphasizes that fast action on short-lived climate forcers will not be able to keep global temperature rise to under 2 degrees C by the end of the century, unless governments decisively act on the principle greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide (CO2).

The report, funded by the Government of Sweden, estimates that around half of the black carbon and methane emission reductions can be achieved through measures that result in cost savings over the lifetime of the investment.

This is because some of the measures—such as recovering rather than emitting natural gas during oil production—allow the methane to be harvested as a clean source of fuel.

Cutting black carbon emissions by, for example, replacing inefficient cookstoves and traditional brick kilns with more efficient ones, also cuts fuel costs for households and kiln operators.

The report points to other economic, social and environmental benefits that are not included in the overall cost-estimates of this assessment. These include:

Upgrading wastewater treatment works will help cut emissions of methane, while improving sanitation and water quality.

Recovery of coal mine methane - carried out for occupational safety reasons as well as for the economic value of methane as a clean-burning energy source - will have significant climate and health benefits.

The report has been requested by developed and developing countries and builds on some ten years of scientific research, first, through the UNEP Atmospheric Brown Cloud project, and more recently via assessments by UNEP and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).

In June this year, UNEP and the WMO released their Integrated Assessment of Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone report, underlining the likely health, agricultural and climate benefits of fast action on these pollutants.

The June report also spotlighted the link between methane emissions and the formation of tropospheric ozone, concluding that methane is contributing by around 50 per cent to increases in background ozone concentrations world-wide.

This, in part, explains why the concentrations of tropospheric ozone in the northern hemisphere have tripled over the past 100 years.

Indeed, tropospheric ozone has become the third most important contributor to man-made climate change, after carbon dioxide and methane itself.

Tropospheric ozone also reduces crop yields and damages human health, when inhaled.

Black carbon, together with other components of particulate matter - emitted as a result of inefficient burning from a wide range of sources, including cook stoves and diesel engines - is a major cause of premature deaths, resulting from outdoor and indoor pollution.

It is also likely to heat up the atmosphere and, when deposited onto ice caps and glaciers, can accelerate melting because less sunlight is reflected back into space.

Fast action on short-lived climate forcers could significantly cut the rate of warming in the Arctic and reduce projected warming in 2040 by 0.7 degrees C, with important implications for the lives and livelihoods of Arctic peoples, biodiversity and global sea-level rise.

Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director, said: “The scientific case for fast action on these so-called ‘Short-Lived Climate Forcers’ has been steadily built over more than a decade—the question governments have been asking over recent months is what are the options and
priorities for action and the likely costs and benefits in order to advance a response to rapidly manage these substances.”

“This report provides that analysis and offers pathways and policies that may allow nations, acting nationally, regionally and globally, to achieve some remarkable gains in terms of a transition to a low emission, resource efficiente
Green Economy over the near term.”

“For some countries the most important benefits result from cost-effective improvements in air pollution and reduced illness and loss of life—black carbon, for example, could be controlled under national and regional air quality agreements. Other countries are also recognizing the food security benefits in terms of reduced crop damage in a world of seven billion people,” said Mr. Steiner.

“For others, it may be the regional and global climate benefits that are uppermost in their minds—whatever the motivation, this report presents the costs and the benefits that can play their part towards a sustainable 21st century as governments head towards Rio+20 in June, next year,” he added.

Key Options for Fast Action to Implement Measure to Reduce SLCFs

Fast action on short lived climate forcers will be required to deliver climate change, health and agricultural benefits over the near term.

The report groups actions into four categories based on relative costs, while also looking at regional benefits and regional sources of the different pollutants.

The 16 measure identified in the report are organized into four categories, based on their relative cost. All have been tried and tested to varying levels in a variety of countries. For example, most European countries have already banned the burning of agricultural wastes, which can be expanded to other regions.
More efficient cookstoves are already being introduced in many parts of the world, including West Africa, China and India.

Emissions standards, such as the Euro 6/VI, are being introduced for vehicles in Europe and other members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) as well as in some non-OECD countries.

Black Carbon

In total, nine priority measures are identified for reducing black carbon emissions, with substantial benefits to health and the environment
A switch from traditional biomass cookstoves to more efficient fan-assisted ones, or stoves fueled by Liquefied Petroleum Gas or biogas, offers the biggest reduction potential in Africa, Asia Pacific and, to some extent, in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Action on cookstoves is also pinpointed as a low cost or cost-saving measure, which would represent close to 25 per cent of the total climate benefit, achievable through the full implementation of all 16 measures on short-lived climate forcers.

A switch to more efficient cookstoves would save householders and communities the time and money, usually spent over the collection and purchase of firewood and other sources of fuel.

The cost of replacing traditional cookstoves with more environmentally-friendly ones may seem low by international standards. However, from the perspective of local users in developing countries, this cost may represent a financial burden. The report looks at ways to overcome such barriers and to link the implementation of such measures to national development plans.

Replacing conventional residential wood burning stoves in North America and Europe with pellet stoves and boilers would also offer important black carbon cuts—estimated at close to 2 per cent of the overall climate benefits.

Replacing traditional brick kilns with more efficient ones could trigger cost savings equal to around $7 a tonnes of CO2 equivalent.

Vertical-shaft brick kilns use about half the energy and, hence half the fuel costs, per brick made compared to the traditional kilns. Methane Cuts to Reduce

Tropospheric Ozone
In respect to methane, seven measures are identified.

The biggest cuts would come from reducing emissions from coal mines and processes related to the production and transport of oil and gas, as well from as the capture of methane from landfill sites.

Globally, nearly 50 per cent of the methane reduction potential can be achieved through measures that will give rise to cost savings over the lifetime of the investment. Cost estimates were calculated according to two different perspectives:

A social planning perspective, where investment in black carbon and methane capture measures constitutes a long-term benefit for society and where cost savings are discounted over the lifetime of the investment.

A private business perspective, which expects a more rapid return on investment and where the implementation of black carbon and methane reduction measures may prove challenging, without adequate access to financing.

In North America, Europe and elsewhere separation and treatment of the biodegradable portion of municipal waste has important benefits—globally, this amounts to close to 10 per cent of the climate benefits linked with fast action.

Further benefits can arise in parts of Asia from exposing continuously flooded rice paddies intermittently to the air under improved management systems, as is now practiced in parts of China—globally, the climate benefits as a proportion of action on short-lived climate forcers is just over three per cent.

The report outlines national actions that can assist in fast-tracking efforts to reduce short-lived climate forcers, ranging from tax incentives, regulation, public education and subsidizes or loans on, for example, improved cookstoves.

Regional actions can include controlling pollutants, such as black carbon, under regional air quality agreements. For example, the UN Economic Commission for Europe’s Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution and its Gothenburg Protocol are currently being reviewed for the possible inclusion of black carbon, as a component of particulate matter.

Globally, there are opportunities for complementary actions that support international treaties, such as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, in respect to methane and tropospheric ozone.

Convening international organizations around common near-term climate protection objectives could be a powerful way of integrating existing initiatives, reducing duplication and inefficient use of resources, while leading to more effective SLCFs mitigation in different sectors, worldwide.

Contacts
Nick Nuttall, UNEP Division of Communication and Public Information Acting Director and Spokesman, tel. +41 795 965 737 or +254 733 632 755;
nick.nuttall@unep.org, or,
Shereen Zorba, Head, UNEP News Desk, tel. +254 78852 6000;
unepnewsdesk@unep.org.


h

Monday, November 21, 2011

2 Degree Celsius Climate Target at Risk from Ozone-Friendly Replacement Chemicals


UNEP NEWS.11/21/2011.Bali (Indonesia)/Nairobi, 21 November 2011. Keeping a global, 21st century temperature rise under 2 degrees Celsius will require urgent action on a group of chemicals increasingly being used in products such as air conditioners, refrigerators, firefighting equipment and insulation foams. The chemicals, collectively known as Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), are becoming popular as replacements for those phased-out or being phased-out to protect the ozone layer—the Earth's high flying shield that filters out dangerous levels of the sun's ultra violet rays.

But a report launched today by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) projects that by 2050 HFCs could be responsible for emissions equivalent to 3.5 to 8.8 Gigatonnes (Gt) of carbon dioxide (Gt CO2eq) - comparable to total current annual emissions from transport, estimated at around 6-7 Gt annually.

Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director, said: "The more than 20 year-old international effort to save the ozone layer ranks among the most successful examples of cooperation and collaboration among nations—the original chemicals, known as CFCs, were phased-out globally in 2010 and countries are freezing and then phasing-out the replacements, HCFCs".

"However a new challenge is rapidly emerging as countries move ahead on HCFCs and that is HFCs. While these 'replacements for the replacement' chemicals cause near zero damage to the ozone layer, they are powerful greenhouse gases in their own right. The good news is that alternatives exist alongside technological solutions according to this international study and while assessing the absolute benefits from switching needs further scientific refinement there is enough compelling evidence to begin moving away from the most powerful HFCs today," he added.

HFCs are, along with CO2, methane and other gases, controlled under the UN's Framework Convention for Combating Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol.
Measures to protect the ozone layer are carried out under the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer.

"Cooperative action between these treaties may be the key to fast action on HFCs, assisting to maintain momentum on recovering the ozone layer while simultaneously reducing risks of accelerated climate change," said Mr Steiner.
The new report HFCs: A Critical Link in Protecting Climate and the Ozone Layer was launched today in Bali, Indonesia, at the 23rd Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol.

The report is the first of three being launched this week by UNEP in the run up to the UN climate convention meeting in Durban, South Africa. (see Notes to Editors)

Key Findings from the HFC report

The contribution of HFCs to climate forcing is currently less than one per cent of all greenhouse gases.

But levels of HFCs are rising as they replace HCFCs—HFC 134a, the most popular type, has increased in the atmosphere by about 10 per cent per year since 2006.

The consumption of HFCs is projected to exceed the peak consumption levels in the 1980s of the old, now fully phased-out CFCs—this is primarily due to rising demand in emerging economies and a global population now above seven billion.

The phase-out and phase-down of CFCs and HCFCs since the late 1980s has reduced greenhouse gas emissions by around 8 Gt C02eq annually while reducing damage to the ozone layer. This has been a tremendous plus for global climate protection.

However, without action, the increasing use of HFCs could add annual greenhouse gas emissions of between 3.5 and 8.8 Gt C02 eq by 2050, and thus undo the large climate benefits scored by the phase out of CFCs and HCFCs since the late 1980s.

The report points to a range of alternatives that could ensure that the impact of HFCs remains small and equal to today's impacts.

Alternative Methods and Processes - these range from improved building design that reduces or avoids the need for air conditioners to fibre rather than foam insulation materials

Non-HFC substances - there are already commercially available alternatives that range from ammonia to dimethyl ether for use in foams, refrigeration and fire protection systems

Climate-friendly HFCs - some HFCs have shorter life-times in the atmosphere of months rather than years. Some of these are being introduced such as HFC 1234ze in foams and HFC-1234yf for mobile air-conditioners
The report points out that, with further technical developments backed by standards, investment incentives and training for technicians and workers, the introduction of alternatives to climate-damaging HFCs could be accelerated and fast-tracked.






On 23 November at 11.30 am GMT UNEP, in collaboration with climate modeling centres, will launch Bridging the Gap: An Assessment which outlines the gap between the commitments and pledges of countries versus where emissions need to be by around 2020 in order to keep a global temperature rise under 2 Degrees C Venue: Kohn Centre, The Royal Society, 6-9 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AG

On 25 November at 11.30am GMT, UNEP in collaboration with researchers will launch a report that outlines a package of 16 measures which could reduce global warming, avoid millions of premature deaths and reduce global crop yield losses by tackling black carbon, methane and ground-level ozone - substances known as short-term climate forcers.

Venue: The Conference Room, The Royal Society, 6-9 Carlton House Terrace, London, SW1Y 5AG
The 17th Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC will take place in Durban from 28 November to 9 December 2011 http://unfccc.int
For more information please contact: Nick Nuttall, Acting Director UNEP Division of Communications and Public Information, on Tel: +254 733 632755 or when travelling +41 79 596 5737, nick.nuttall@unep.org

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Honduras. Pico Bonito Sustainable Forests Project

After not reaching an agreement with the Project Entity (EcoLogic) to terminate the project with a recovery of the costs of project preparation, and based on a decision made by the  Bio Carbon Fun Participants in their last annual meeting, the Bank proceeded to terminate the project without recovery of preparation costs.

World Bank.Author: Segura Warnholtz,Gerardo. Document Date: 2011/11/17.Document Type: Implementation Status and Results Report. Report Number: ISR4412

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication

Unep.org/NewsCentreBeijing, 16 November 2011-A new UN report demonstrates that governments and businesses alike are taking steps to accelerate a global shift towards a low-carbon, resource-efficient and socially inclusive green future. From China to Barbados, Brazil to South Africa, countries are developing Green Economy strategies and activities to spur greater economic growth and jobs, environmental protection and equality.
In a statement issued on the release of UNEP's flagship report, Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said: "With the world looking ahead to the Rio+20 UN Conference on Sustainable Development in June 2012, the UNEP Green Economy report challenges the myth that there is a trade-off between the economy and the environment. With smart public policies, governments can grow their economies, generate decent employment and accelerate social progress in a way that keeps humanity's ecological footprint within the planet's carrying capacity."
Key Messages
The report, a result of a three-year global research effort involving hundreds of experts, underwent a three-month public review before being unveiled today. It confirms that an investment of two percent of global GDP across 10 key sectors is what is required to kick-start a shift from the current brown, polluting and inefficient economy to a green one.

The report estimates that such a transition would grow the global economy at around the same rate, if not higher, than those forecast, under current economic models.

But without rising risks, shocks, scarcities and crises increasingly inherent in the existing, resource-depleting, high carbon 'brown' economy, says the study.
In addition to higher growth, an overall transition to a Green Economy would realize per capita incomes higher than under current economic models, while reducing the ecological footprint by nearly 50 per cent in 2050, as compared to business-as-usual.
The Green Economy Report acknowledges that in the short-term, job losses in some sectors - fisheries for example - are inevitable if they are to transition towards sustainability.
However, it adds that over time the number of "new and decent jobs created" in sectors - ranging from renewable energies to more sustainable agriculture - will, however, offset those lost from the former "brown economy".
As a result, a growing number of countries are undertaking activities to accelerate this transition.
At the China Council meeting this week, for example, the government's international advisory group is expected to put forward its own study for moving towards a Green Economy.
China is the world's lead investor in renewable energy, overtaking Spain in 2009 and spending US$49 billion in 2010. Overall, China is committed to spending US$468 billion over the next five years, more than double the previous five years, on key industries, including renewable energy, clean technologies and waste management.
"China considers the Green Economy to be a strategic choice in an increasingly resource constrained world, and we have made that choice in our development plans," said Mr. He Bingguang, Director General of the Department of Resource Conservation and Environmental Protection in China's National Development and Reform Commission.
"We appreciate UNEP's contribution in promoting a global Green Economy transformation, which holds the potential for all countries to benefit," he added.
Some countries, such as Barbados, Cambodia, Indonesia, the Republic of Korea and South Africa, already have national Green Economy plans that reflect the report's recommendations.
Others such as Armenia, Azerbaijan, Egypt, Kenya, Jordan, Malaysia, Mexico, Nepal, Senegal and Ukraine are focusing on greening priority sectors, such as agriculture, renewable energy, tourism and clean technologies.
Today in Rwanda, East African countries are meeting to explore how laws and regulatory frameworks can help drive a Green Economy at the national and regional level. Participants from Burundi, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, as well as Rwanda, will examine case studies and continent-wide initiatives, the latter being led by the African Union.
On the business side, UNEP has teamed up with 285 of the world's leading investors, representing US$20 trillion in assets, who called on governments to mobilize action on climate change, including investments in emerging industries - like renewables and green buildings. Similar calls have been echoed by the International Chamber of Commerce, which represents hundreds of thousands of businesses in more than 130 countries.
"The elements of a transition to a Green Economy are clearly emerging across developing and developed countries alike. There are now some nations going further and faster than others which is in many ways generating a 'pull factor' that, if maintained, may bring others along over the coming months and years," said Achim Steiner, UN Under Secretary General and Executive Director of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP).
The recent drive in clean investment is not only benefitting emerging economies, but also other developing countries. According to the latest Bloomberg figures, global investments in renewable energy jumped 32 per cent in 2010, to a record US$211 billion. After the emerging economies of Brazil, China and India, countries in Africa posted the highest percentage increase of all developing regions.
In Egypt, renewable energy investment rose by US$800 million to US$1.3 billion as a result of the solar thermal project in Kom Ombo and a 220 megawatt onshore wind farm in the Gulf of Zayt. In Kenya, investment climbed from virtually zero in 2009 to US$1.3 billion in 2010 across technologies such as wind, geothermal, small-scale hydro and biofuels.
In the California Mojave Desert, one of the world's largest solar-thermal power plants is under construction and others are also being built in Spain and other parts of the United States.
"The Durban climate convention meeting in a few week's time and Rio+20 next year are key opportunities to accelerate and scale-up the Green Economy. Central cooperative actions range from advancing Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+), moving on green procurement to switch national efforts into the sustainability space up to a new indicator of wealth that goes beyond GDP and internalizes the costs of pollution and degradation while bringing the true value of the planet's nature-based assets into calculations of a successful and sustainable economic path," said Mr. Steiner.
A series of UN-backed regional consultations on the Green Economy have underscored the growing interest in the report. While issues of financing and trade need to be addressed further, there is an acknowledgement that the current economic model, based solely on GDP growth, has resulted in the gross misallocation of capital and inequitable distribution of wealth.
The Report shows that investing the equivalent of two per cent of global GDP into agriculture, energy, buildings, water, forestry, fisheries, manufacturing, waste, tourism and transport would not only shift the global economy onto a more sustainable growth trajectory, but it would actually maintain or increase growth over time compared to the current business-as-usual scenario.
Policy recommendations on each of the 10 key sectors, as well as on finance and enabling conditions, are outlined in the report.
On transport, for example, the report suggests that prices need to take account of the societal costs accumulated as a result of congestion, accidents and pollution, which in some cases amount to over 10 per cent of the national or regional GDP. In Beijing, a 2009 study estimated that the social costs induced by motorized transportation are equivalent to between 7.5 and 15 per cent of the city's GDP.
Globally, the transport sector's impact on natural resources is wide-ranging, from the manufacturing of vehicles, which uses metals and plastics, to its use of fossil fuels, which involves engine oil, rubber and other consumable materials. Between 2007 and 2030, the transport sector is expected to account for 97 per cent of the increase in the world's primary oil use.
With the number of vehicles in China expected to more than triple during this period, the government is promoting low-carbon, energy efficient cars and related infrastructure. In the city of Shenzhen, home of China's first electric car, plans are underway to build large recharging stations and replace traditional buses with more than 7,000 electric ones in five years time.
Generating Jobs
The Green Economy Report suggests that over time "new and decent jobs" will be catalyzed in these key sectors. A recent study by ILO and the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), entitled, Low Carbon Development and Green Employment in China, confirms that this is the case.
It provides a list of likely winners and losers and the scale of direct and indirect impact involved to identify net gains. It concludes that while 800,000 workers in small coal power plants in China are likely to lose their jobs due to climate mitigation actions, some 2.5 million jobs could be created by 2020 in the wind energy sector alone.
Currently, Denmark is home to the world's top wind turbine manufacturer in terms of market volume, and China is in second place, followed by the United States and then another Chinese company. Germany ranks fifth. However, Germany has recently committed to scale up its renewable energy, following a decision to phase out nuclear power by 2022, and has thus set a target to source 35 per cent of its electricity from renewable energies by 2022, instead of the earlier target of 19 per cent.
In Africa, despite recent economic gains, there is increasing interest in creating green and decent employment. Representatives from 11 African countries met in June this year with ILO, UNDP and UNEP to look at case studies in the areas of recycling, sustainable construction and natural resource management. As a result, participants adopted action plans for creating green jobs in fisheries, agriculture and forestry, sectors which represent over 70 per cent of the employment in the region.
In Brazil, the ILO recently helped support the construction of 500,000 new homes with solar heating systems, resulting in 30,000 new jobs. In South Africa, a similar project on water ecosystem restoration created 25,000 green jobs for previously unemployed people, and at the same time, restored vital freshwater sources.
Generating Social Equity
Approximately two billion people live on smallholder farms, and despite making a significant contribution to food security, the majority of these farmers are malnourished and live in poverty. Low prices, unfair trade practice and a lack of transport contribute to their dilemma. The Green Economy Report argues that by moving to more sustainable agriculture practices, these farmers could increase their yields and profits.
Globally, an investment of US$100-300 billion per year in green agriculture, between now and 2050, could lead to better soil quality and better yields for major crops, representing a 10 per cent increase over the current business-as-usual strategies. As many of these farmers are also women, any benefits would most likely be shared with their families and communities.
The waste sector is another area that is expected to enhance social equity. Efforts to green the sector are often driven by cost savings, environmental awareness and resource scarcity.
However, the report notes that greening the sector not only requires improving the often sub-standard waste treatment and disposal facilities, it also entails training the workers, providing more equitable compensation and ensuring proper health care protection for them. Decentralizing large scale, capital-intensive waste management operations could also provide more employment opportunities in the community.
Electronic waste (or e-waste) is also a concern, particularly for developing countries. Current estimates suggest 20 to 50 million tonnes of e-waste are generated each year, while trade in waste becomes more prevalent, heightening threats to human health and the environment.
As sales in mobile phones and computers continue to grow in China, India, and across Africa and Latin America, the report finds that resource recovery and recycling offer the greatest potential in terms of contributing to a Green Economy.
Notes to the Editors:
Rio Earth Summit: In 1992 the UN Conference on Sustainable Development, popularly known as the Rio Earth Summit, was convened in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to address the state of the environment and sustainable development. In June 2012, there will be the follow up meeting or Rio+20 in Brazil, where one of the main themes governments are expected to address is Green Economy "in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication".

For more information, please contact:
Nick Nuttall, UNEP Division of Communication and Public Information Acting Director and Spokesman, Tel. +41 795 965 737 or +254 733 632 755 or email nick.nuttall@unep.org
Ms. Jiang Nanqing, UNEP China Office, Tel. +86-10-85320922, Mobile: +86-13501051650, Email: nanqing.jiang@unep.org
Ms. Chen Hao, UNEP China Office, Tel: +86-10-85320921, Mobile: +86-15810425490, Email: hao.bath@gmail.com